unlike the cognitively lesser beasts we are not slaves to irresistible biological urges, we have some element of choice in the matter and can learn to exercise our sexual capacities that are *optimal* for the specific individual, all individuals being quite unique and not uniformly driven to satisfy primal drives in a uniform way. human life is too complicated a story to make your picture of these things more realistic than mine.

what really needs to happen is for people to relax, be themselves, explore their comfort zones with people they trust, and see where the amorous flow takes them. what if physical and emotional intimacy (the peak of such being romantic love) are an added sought-for dimension in the human sexual experience (there's no "if" about it) for a great many people? then your too-broadly-applied rule doesn't reflect the way things really are. maybe a number of the guys aren't out for a fuck on a first date - if it happens, nice, but it's not like a goal of the first date going in. There's more to us than just the animal aspect of us, we are also thinking creatures - and it's no coincidence that the brain is the biggest erogenous zone in the human body especially with the possibilities of fantasy and imagination. sometimes a really well-done fantasy about sucking cock are almost just as satisfying as the real thing. again, human sexual life is so complex that rarely do you get easy workable formulas. for a lot of people what really matters most is finding the right person, a soulmate, and where the sex life gradually figures itself out as their emotional bond grows over time. it's not always just all about rubbing your genitals, reaching sweet orgasm, and squirting that hod load.

anyway, here's a lusty emoticon to sign off with:

Good point...but you missed mine...or ignored it.

Maybe to a small rudimentary-minded percentage of our population that may be the case as well as most other countries, however most of us here Down Under still believe in propriety and do not act like dogs on the prowl looking for a quick rut.
Generally the morals of most of us are still above those of the participants on "reality" shows such as Big Br0ther or The Jersey Shore.

i doubt certain aspects of your claims here. just have a look at the male/female breakdown of the userbase here - lots of guy sluts while my impression has been that (most of) the ladies are looking for more than just a nice cock, body or even face if they're gonna go to bed with a guy; they want some kind of emotional connection to get turned on as well. sure, by the time they get turned on they'll be just as slutty as guys, but i think it doesn't take as much for (most of) the guys to get all slutty. hell, why do you think female hookers outnumber male ones by such a huge margin (and many of the male ones serve male clients)?

the many sexually frustrated men out there only wish almost all the chicks were as slutty as guys are, they'd be hooking up as easily as they can hook up anonymously with a guy on craigslist (but would rather be hooking up with chicks - and the guys way outnumber chicks in the craiglist sex personals as well.) as for "almost all chicks" being slutty, i think there's a continuum from slutty (little to no standards beyond mere sexual attraction) to not-so-slutty (nuns being the extreme - and if/when nuns masturbate as they're often accused of doing, it's most likely to get the urge off their minds and out of the way, not because of lust.)