I guess you need to define 'Tranny' and 'Shemale'. From what I understand, both still have testicles, and a penis, but are taking hormones to suppress the 'male' and enhance the 'female'.
Unless 'she' has been castrated, there is a chance of pregnancy should said 'Shemale/Tranny' have sex with a woman.
Uh, re-read the posts underneath here, and you will find a lot of 'tongue-in-cheek' humour and metaphors, with *lix*'s being a great start, and including mine.
Perhaps you might want to "re-read" some humour books, to better understand its uses.
Nope. The whole reason why someone is a shemale is because he has disfunctional reproductive organs. (S)he actually has ovari in his ballsack, instead of balls. Some might produce sperm though, but their sperm contain eggs instead of spermatoza.
Given that likely English is not your native language, I will assume that you meant, "Some might produce SEMEN though, .."
Semen containing eggs not spermatozoon is a fascinating concept--such as 'egg donors' having such an easy time donating, etc.
no its not possible and if they did their offspring would be gender neutral and have not sexual urges at all, they might not have any genitals what so ever and pick their noses constantly, than again they could have nuts dragging on the ground and cock the size of pink polka dotted elephants *lix*
Aha! So, this kind of 'impregnation' then produces a human equivalent of a 'mule'--a sterile animal! Thank you so much for this enlightenment. [And perhaps 'toondick' no longer has to worry. ]
Unless 'she' has been castrated, there is a chance of pregnancy should said 'Shemale/Tranny' have sex with a woman.
Perhaps you might want to "re-read" some humour books, to better understand its uses.
Semen containing eggs not spermatozoon is a fascinating concept--such as 'egg donors' having such an easy time donating, etc.
And I'm still fascinated by your 'tongue-in-cheek' idea of shemales have ovari in their ballscks.
New Comment Go to top