Yes, I am aware that there are ways around but what I don't understand is WHY. I mean, the guy is straight up weird! In one thread he says this;

"Dearest Bella. You just cannot help yourself, no matter what I say or write you find it necessary to have your pointless say. 

Anyway you are now banned along with the other twits so you are now out of sight and out of mind."

Okay, what have I missed? WHO cannot help themself? WHO found it necessary to have their pointless say? And how can the 7 "twits" that you've blacklisted really be "out of sight and out of mind" if you're constantly reading and responding to their posts? Wake up, old man, you're fricken weird!

Here's another one of your well thought out posts;

"Without doubt the two "moral guardians" will find it necessary to have their obligatory self-elevating comments seeing I have forwarded an opinion."

What have I missed, WHO really is the member that is the "moral guardian" of the site and WHO is the member that really posts "obligatory self-elevating comments"?

That kinda looks like JohnS except you need to swap out the top hat for a scarf and remove the clothing so we can have full benefit of his small, uh, erm, mind!

Speaking of typical and stupid, look who found this thread after only 3 weeks! Yep, it was none other than the Australian Asshat, himself! You got to give King Creepy and his only friends, Huey, Dewey and Louie, props for sniffing this out! It might take the old fart a bit longer to find things, post his retort and vote it down, but he gets the job done!

I'm sure he was referring to me as being "stupid" but can someone please explain to me how he is able to see and respond to my posts after he has blacklisted me?

Isn't it peculiar that I posted my thoughts and a little contest in the RANDOM BULLSHIT..... thread and it is now POOF!, gone!?

I saw a post made by you-know-who, who was concerned about the "embarrassment to all we Australians" that he felt because of an artist who paints using his penis. you-know-who's post was short and went on to say that the "64 years old Mr. Patch should reconsider his fashion choices especially the absurd hat".

I found the entire post funny and made it into a contest, my question to the membership was who made the post. There was only one response and it was correct.

C'mon, the artist was called out for painting with his penis and wearing what was perceieved to be a fashion faux pas, an "absurd hat"! Strange thing is, you-know-who wears a doo-rag on his head.

So it didn't end with just my post being deleted, the member who posted the correct response received the following ANONYMOUS message;

anonymous wroteFeb 25, 09:57):

At least my bandana does not look as hideous as all the rings of your dick.


Apparently, you-know-who, not only invests much of his time hunting for fakes but does monitor what is said without being logged in otherwise how is he able to see what is said and have it deleted since he blacklisted me!?

Here's you-know-who's final response to the matter once he had the the post deleted;

Dear *****.

If you click on the link I sent you it will take you to another discussion where two leading premium members who should be setting an example to the membership twist the above comments and launch into yet another ridiculous attempt to embarrass me and have the usual shot at Australia. 
One comment about my bandanna is particularly silly.

It's sad that you-know-who perception of other members comments as being "silly" yet he gets his knickers in a knot when members call his comments as racist, sexist OR just plain dumb!

To admin, if you are going to allow you-know-who to post his thoughts on various matters, you should at least allow members an avenue to respond without those responses or posts being deleted. Thank you.