| If you have (or hypothetically if you did have) a cock, would you rather have one that's a foot long (30.5cm) with a 6.5" circumference (16.5cm), or one that's 5" long (12.7cm), 5" around, and ugly as sin?
For anyone who likes cock, which would you rather your partner have? |
but that is not an option in the question. then i would have to choose for the small one...although it is real small
wife wouldnt be happy
Just for the hell of it, I made a list of some of the words I could remember people using to describe how good or bad they look, from better to worse..
gorgeous, beautiful, sculpted, alluring, enticing, sexy, hot, pretty, cute, decent-looking, plain, unappealing, off-putting, unattractive, unsightly, ugly, gross, disgusting, repulsive, hideous, grotesque
My cock is almost 6.5 inches around, and women like that. It stretches out their cunt and fills them up. Perfect would probably 6.5 by 6.5.
Ugly is relative. Cocks are a bit strange looking anyway. Most have curves, some double curves, and the head has many shapes. I don't know how strange it would be to be considered ugly. But I would go for the ugly, shorter one. Given the choice. I doubt that it would make much fucking difference.
Didn't wanna pick one, huh?
ofcourse i would like to have a long one instead of small or normal.
i m sure there will be guys or girls that will protest in this and will say huge is not always good but...
Lets face it... Huge is nice to be or have. And you added the uggly thing... how is that a quetion? its directing you to answer 30cm please!!!
New Comment Go to top