Started by #435701 [Ignore] 24,Sep,18 13:33
 | only registered users can see external links
This is quite an interesting and very upsetting video. Four people involved...the future dead guy who is drunk. His wife who obviously thinks it cain't happen to her/him/them...And last but not least, that hugely misshapen TROLL and his offspring carrying a pump shot gun...there is so much more to say, but I just don't have the energy to bring Trumplehead, the NRA, gun lobbyists, gun makers and the bottom line, the Constitution, Muricah da bootifool, it's 'justice' system and 'pipples' lack of ability to see through a situation and it's OBVIOUS outcome before they do something REALLY stupid!!  or  depending on one's viewpoint...Oh, forgot the detriment of the gene pool as wonderfully illustrated by the "Troll's" son.  |
New Comment Rating: 0
Similar topics: 1. Penis shape/outline at the Swimming Pool 2.have you ever wanted to bang your daughter inlaw ? 3.When you were growing up or even now : when you went to the gym or pool did you ever felt in awe at a guy that had a big cock ? 4.Gun **** in America 5.Swimming Pool - Nude Swiming
Comments:
Now, as far as cleaning up my own mess and calling me a 'rat' Titter, titter...I DO clean up after myself. And my dog, too!!
When I spoke of places needing cleaning up,I was thinking of places like Chicago with multi-able murders everyday and no one even bat's a eye at it.
The mentality of ignoring the crime in cities like that needs cleaning moreso than alot of other things from our society.The loss of 1,ONE life is to much. Guns or no guns.
Read my post below about the man clubbing people to death.
That is sicko.
Sadly with a gun, once the clic and bang happens, there is no rewind. But when you swing a club the first time it may be a uncontrolled rage. BUT,you have to draw back and reswing.Again and again. Each time you have more time to focus on killing that person. Each swing you have the chance to stop and reconsider what you are doing.
You don't agitate people for to long without expecting a reaction.If you know your neighbors are drunkards,and have guns,you leave them the hell alone.You don't push them.
And responsible people should know better than to get drunk in the first place.Chemical abuse,be it alcohol or dop3 is the root of much of the worlds problems. People use it and expect to not be held accountable for any dumb mistakes they make or putting themselves in harms way they would not do sober.And they sure don't expect to be held accountable for any harm they do to others while under the influence.
I lost family to liquor, so I am not a supporter of it's use except in 1's home away from others so the only harm done is to the user.
BTW, I think only you call it San Franshitco as I have yet to hear that anywhere else. Plus, I don't ACTUALLY live in San Franshitco. TOO stupidly expensive even for rich people.
Use CNN and Google to find a response that makes sense you muppet.
Have another handful of dem skittly things.
--------------------------------------- added after 17 hours
edit,note the lack of response to my statement.
That confirms it,people don't notice or care about the folks being killed in Chicago.
I went thru Detroit back in 03 and some of that city,I DO not want to go back to.Scary.
Now,which do you think takes a more deranged person? Killing with a gun or physically beating the hell out of someone with a club or bat?
A gun is clic,bang,dead.
A club ,to kill someone,is WACK,WACK,and repeat until fatigued or whatever.
You know, there are other things to do other than kill...
I think you missed the point of my post.I was not saying there were only 2 things to do in life,I was asking which person would have to be more deranged,the beater or the shooter.
Also, the neighbor apparently put the mattress in the trash, it was the father/son who kept throwing the mattress back on the neighbor's property. Not that it matters, they both stood there intentionally escalating with an unarmed man, and shot him (at least 3 times??) for throwing a bat at them. The neighbor was ridiculously foolish too, but I bet a lot of people would be if some nasty hicks pulled guns out with their family present.
The sad thing is, people will just view this situation based on how it might affect their agendas, on either side, instead of the actual tragedy. That guy's "common-law wife" just watched her husband/boyfriend get shot in the head And chest, by a pistol and a freaking shotgun. Such a big loss for such a petty dispute
Even being Canadian, I can't imagine the back and forth about gun control being resolved anytime remotely soon. Personally, I think anyone who drinks regularly or has a history of substance abuse or violent outbursts shouldn't be allowed a gun - but being real, that probably covers a large number of those who insist they need their guns to feel safe. And even cops drink and unwind..
This story is more disturbing than most to me, because haven't most of us either had a drunken altercation, or watched friends of ours have them and make asses of themselves? Most of us have been lucky enough that those became funny stories, rather than the day we lost someone forever. I think that's one aspect everyone can probably relate to if they think about it.
Some of you are looking at banning the gun.
Well, remember back years ago,folks tried to ban the alcohol for similar reasons you folks want to ban guns.
It didn't work.
Matter of fact it caused alot more deaths and **** once the liqueur was hard to get . Now the government sells the alcohol, and taxes the hell out of it,and then arrest you for using to much and doing something you shouldn't. Hum?
So is the solution perhaps to let the government sell the guns and ammo and tax the hell out of them and arrest you for using the stuff for the wrong reasons? Oh,wait a minute,if you kill someone you already will get arrested? That would be redundant behavior on the governments part.
The only reason I can semi-agree with your opinion that banning guns would end in more deaths is because unfortunately the US has already allowed guns to become so entrenched in the culture that there will be a backlash. So between criminals holding a surplus of weapons that used to be easy to get, and people so angry at losing their guns that they turn to those same criminals to get them illegally... yeah it probably wouldn't go well for quite some time.
Still, I always hear the logic "If guns are banned, the criminals will still have guns and we'll be in danger"... Meanwhile in Canada, most don't carry firearms - yes most criminals can access weapons, but strangely we have drastically fewer gun fatalities and nearly as few mass/school shootings as the rest of the world except the US. The major difference that allows that to work, in my opinion, is that we never became dependent on guns in the first place. Maybe attached is a better word.
So maybe banning guns in the US would be more trouble than it's worth. Nothing wrong with meeting in the middle and debating changes to current gun control laws that would help prevent pointless tragedies like the one this thread was started about, though.
Not all folks with guns are drunken idiots.
Besides, the neighbor should have left the damn mattress in the trash and not thrown it in the folks yard.
Not reason to be getting shot by any means. But who knows how much trouble that neighbor had been in the past and the law called with nothing being done.Sometimes people just get tired of being fucked with.Temporary insanity would be the best defense in court.They just lost their tempers.
--------------------------------------- added after 5 minutes
And the media succeeded in it's quest to find an isolated case of a bunch of drunken idiots with guns? Where do you live? Can I move there? Every day there's a shooting in a bar or party where fogged up idiots shoot and kill someone.
The gun was just handy.Had they been sober,it might have just been a couple bloody noses.
But since a gun was there,the alcohol takes a back seat?
New Comment Go to top