The latest Court cases. The Court where all defendants are guilty until proven innocent. The Court Judges are; Chief Justice; RuFino 85 yrs old, Judge Clarisbinda 60 yrs old and Judge Florisbinda 76, yrs old.
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence of this case;
COUNT I VIOLATION PAGE ACT
1. The defendant's profile is showing negative gifts.
2. The defendant is violating the following Clean PAGE ACT RULE, which states that each member must maintain their profile page clean of any negative gifts. A member receives a warning to clean up his/her page.
3. The defendant's page has been dirty for the past 3 weeks.
COUNT II CONTEMPT OF COURT
1. The defendant in a previous Court order has been ordered to stop banned members from commenting on her page.
2. Defendant's actions are considered refusal to obey and follow the Court orders.
COUNT III SOLICITING TO CLEAN PROFILE PAGE
1. The defendant is soliciting for cleaning her page.
2. The defendant asked member, PITBULL to clean her dirty page. Member PITBULL refused her request.
3. No member shall order another member to clean a page unless they do so voluntarily.
COUNT IV ATTACKING IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant has violated the rule of the Immunity Member Act. Under this Act no member is allow to; defame, attack, send negative gifts or be blacklisted.
2. The defendant CAT52! violated this ACT several times when she attacked the following Immunity Memge Sir-Skittles.
Judge; RuFino; You are GUILTY of the above charges and you should refrain from making comments on blogs and forums on this site.
You are so misinformed. --------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
States Can't Ban Sex Offenders from All Social Media
States cannot ban sex offenders from using all social media or internet sites. The U.S. Supreme Court struck down a law in North Carolina that banned convicted sex offenders from Facebook and other social medial websites.Feb 21, 2024
This is getting tiresome. Woody can access any internet site per the Supreme Court, but, my account is MY account and I can post ANY pics I have that I've obtained legally. Also, this is a porn site as you've well know and reminded us. U.N.DERAGE MEMBERS ARE NOT ALLOWED. So, what is it with you? Are you threatening me again by using my pics TO BLACKMAIL ME (ADMIN)?
No cunt- you said he was allowed here- and is NOT... that is why he deleted his account and fled like a cockroach with the lights turned on... Probably a familiar scene in the yellow one story dumpster you live in!
You seem to be worried that someone may do that... Oh my! I would probably just delete your scummy profile. It appears you are not happy here and with your life choices. Looks like they continue to haunt you!
Clerk of the Court: The court will have a hearing on GingerDaddy charged with CHAT ROOM VIOLATION RULES and Contempt of Court. Judge Tomasina has dismissed the Contempt of Court without prejudice.
This Court declares all the evidence in this case to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CHAT RULES
1. The defendant GingerDaddy has violated the Rules of Chat Room 3 times.
2. Under the chat room rules, all chat room hosts must announce when they leave their room, including break times.
3. The defendant violated the above 3 times while on this site.
4. Leaving the chat room without an announcement is considered chat room abandonment.
Judge Tomasina; Mr. GingerDaddy, you have violated the chat room rules 3 times. This is outrageous. If you continue with this type of behaviour, the Court will order a Gag Order. You are guilty of the above charges.
This Court declares all the following statements to be true based on the case's evidence.
COUNT I. Chat Room Violation
1. The defendant, on March 28, 2025, opened a chat room on the site.
2. The defendant, GingerDaddy used foul language while hosting his room. The defendant use the words "fuck" while chatting with members.
3. The defendant violated Rule 301 Sec. C, which states no member is allowed to use foul language of any type. The defendant has violated this rule on March 28, 2025.
Judge Tomasina; Mr. GingerDaddy, you have a filthy mouth. Control yourself in chat rooms. I found you guilty of the above charges and you will on probation for 30 days.
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true.
COUNT I. GAG ORDER VIOLATION
1. The defendant was placed on a Gag Order on March 14, 2025.
2. Under that Gag Order, the defendant was ordered to refrain from making comments or opinions attacking other site members.
3. Defendant refused to follow this Order by this Court.
COUNT II. INTIMIDATING A JUDGE
1. The defendant has defamed the integrity of this Court.
2. Defendant told the judges to "you lick ass". This is a clear violation of intimidation and disrespect of the Court system.
COUNT III. CONTEMPT OF COURT
1. The defendant has violated all previous orders by this Court, and now she is in Contempt of Court.
2. The defendant CAT52! is a hostile member of the site.
Judge Tomasina; Ms. CAT52! You has shown no respect to this Court and refused to obey this Court orders. You are now reached the limit of this Court decisions with respect to your cases here. The Holly Counsel may take action against you.
Clerk of the Court; Judge pro-temp. Tomasin will execute the following legal order by the Court.
ON THIS day Thursday the 20th of March, 2025 this Court will charge the following defendant @CAT52! a/k/a Saggy Granny with CONTEMPT OF COURT for failure to remove video/picture that this order her to delete from her profile/picture/video #2 from her page.
No, I asked Veryshyguy if I could use it and he said it was ok. I have over 600 tributes that I keep. Some I posted. I have never posted a tribute without permission from the contributor.
Clerk of the Court; This Court has charged the defendant; xxx25, with disturbing the Court's peace. Chief Justice RuFino will be presiding over this hearing.
This Court declares all statements on this Complaint to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. DISTURBING COURT PEACE
1. The defendant xxx25 has violated the rules of the Court when disturbing all Court proceedings during Court hours.
2. The defendant xxx25 has engaged in personal attacks with member PITBULL during the Court hours of 9 AM-8 PM.
3. No member is allowed to engage in any arguments related to the Court proceedings outside the Court room.
Judge RuFino; Mr. xxx25 you have a foul mouth. You must respect the Court Hearings. You are an idiot. Now you are in a gag order. The Court will seek a Graded Offense.
This Court declares all the statements on this case are true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant xxx25 has violated the site's CLEAN PAGE ACT. Under this Act, members must maintain and keep their pages free from negative gifts.
2. The defendant's page is filthy. His page has been filthy for the past 2 weeks.
3. The defendant has shown disregard for keeping his page clean.
JUDGE: Clarisbinda; Mr. xxx25 your page is filthy. This is not good. It's time for you to clean your messy page. It is disgusting and ugly. I order you to clean your page within 20 days or be in Contempt of Court.
This Court declares all statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. DISTURBING OF A COURT HEARING
1. The defendant xxx25 has been charged with a Court hearing, under the rules of the Court.
2. Defendant, during a hearing of the Court, makes
arguments and attacks against member Sir-Skittles.
3. This Court will not tolerate attacks outside the Court during a case hearing.
Judge Fredesbinda; This Court will order you to cease making comments, soliciting, and other illegal activities during a Court session. You are GUILTY of the above charges
Clerk of the Court; The Court has charged member @midwestmilf" with the Clean Page Act violation. The Honorable Judge Clarisbinda will be presiding over this Hearing.
This Court declares all the statements on this Complaint to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. Clean Page Act Violation
1. The defendant has violated the Clean Page Act Rule. Under this rule members with 3 or more negative gifts have been defined by this Court as trash.
2. The defendant has violated this rule as her page received 3 negative gifts. The defendant refused to clean her page.
Judge Clarisbinda Sentence. Ms. Midwestmilf. you must clean your page within 30 days. Failure to clean your page will result on Contempt of Court. Jan. 28, 2025
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52!@
a/k/a Saggy Granny, defendant.
_________________________________/
........................COMPLAINT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence of this case;
COUNT I VIOLATION PAGE ACT
1. The defendant's profile is showing negative gifts.
2. The defendant is violating the following Clean PAGE ACT RULE, which states that each member must maintain their profile page clean of any negative gifts. A member receives a warning to clean up his/her page.
3. The defendant's page has been dirty for the past 3 weeks.
COUNT II CONTEMPT OF COURT
1. The defendant in a previous Court order has been ordered to stop banned members from commenting on her page.
2. Defendant's actions are considered refusal to obey and follow the Court orders.
COUNT III SOLICITING TO CLEAN PROFILE PAGE
1. The defendant is soliciting for cleaning her page.
2. The defendant asked member, PITBULL to clean her dirty page. Member PITBULL refused her request.
3. No member shall order another member to clean a page unless they do so voluntarily.
COUNT IV ATTACKING IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant has violated the rule of the Immunity Member Act. Under this Act no member is allow to; defame, attack, send negative gifts or be blacklisted.
2. The defendant CAT52! violated this ACT several times when she attacked the following Immunity Memge Sir-Skittles.
Judge; RuFino; You are GUILTY of the above charges and you should refrain from making comments on blogs and forums on this site.
3/7/25
She is putting Charlie at risk- he can't be on or exposed to sex sites!
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
States Can't Ban Sex Offenders from All Social Media
States cannot ban sex offenders from using all social media or internet sites. The U.S. Supreme Court struck down a law in North Carolina that banned convicted sex offenders from Facebook and other social medial websites.Feb 21, 2024
The democrap party will be destroyed
Maybe someone will send the screenshots from his profile to the sex crimes unit in Florida
You seem to be worried that someone may do that... Oh my! I would probably just delete your scummy profile. It appears you are not happy here and with your life choices. Looks like they continue to haunt you!
SITO Court Members, plaintiffs
vs.
GingerDAddy. defendant
_______________________________/
This Court declares all the evidence in this case to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CHAT RULES
1. The defendant GingerDaddy has violated the Rules of Chat Room 3 times.
2. Under the chat room rules, all chat room hosts must announce when they leave their room, including break times.
3. The defendant violated the above 3 times while on this site.
4. Leaving the chat room without an announcement is considered chat room abandonment.
Judge Tomasina; Mr. GingerDaddy, you have violated the chat room rules 3 times. This is outrageous. If you continue with this type of behaviour, the Court will order a Gag Order. You are guilty of the above charges.
The Site Court is coming after you and your fat lump coolie wife! ICE will send her back to Manila to work the rice fields!
Fat fucking ginger retard!
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
____________________________/
This Court declares all the following statements to be true based on the case's evidence.
COUNT I. Chat Room Violation
1. The defendant, on March 28, 2025, opened a chat room on the site.
2. The defendant, GingerDaddy used foul language while hosting his room. The defendant use the words "fuck" while chatting with members.
3. The defendant violated Rule 301 Sec. C, which states no member is allowed to use foul language of any type. The defendant has violated this rule on March 28, 2025.
Judge Tomasina; Mr. GingerDaddy, you have a filthy mouth. Control yourself in chat rooms. I found you guilty of the above charges and you will on probation for 30 days.
4/1/25
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52! defendant.
__________________________/
.........................COMPLAINT...........................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true.
COUNT I. GAG ORDER VIOLATION
1. The defendant was placed on a Gag Order on March 14, 2025.
2. Under that Gag Order, the defendant was ordered to refrain from making comments or opinions attacking other site members.
3. Defendant refused to follow this Order by this Court.
COUNT II. INTIMIDATING A JUDGE
1. The defendant has defamed the integrity of this Court.
2. Defendant told the judges to "you lick ass". This is a clear violation of intimidation and disrespect of the Court system.
COUNT III. CONTEMPT OF COURT
1. The defendant has violated all previous orders by this Court, and now she is in Contempt of Court.
2. The defendant CAT52! is a hostile member of the site.
Judge Tomasina; Ms. CAT52! You has shown no respect to this Court and refused to obey this Court orders. You are now reached the limit of this Court decisions with respect to your cases here. The Holly Counsel may take action against you.
3/28/25
ON THIS day Thursday the 20th of March, 2025 this Court will charge the following defendant @CAT52! a/k/a Saggy Granny with CONTEMPT OF COURT for failure to remove video/picture that this order her to delete from her profile/picture/video #2 from her page.
Judge Tomasina-SITO COurt
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52!, defendant.
____________________________/
................CONTEMPT OF COURT.......................
This Court certified the defendant CAT52! has violated an order from this Court;
REF....The Court found the defendant guilty of violating the free speech.
REF....The defendant continues to ban members from making comments on her page.
This Court imposes a Gag Order on defendant
Judge Fredesbinda
3/14/25
SITO Members, Plaintiffs,
v.
xxx25, Defendant.
___________________________/
....................COMPLAINT.............................
This Court declares all statements on this Complaint to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. DISTURBING COURT PEACE
1. The defendant xxx25 has violated the rules of the Court when disturbing all Court proceedings during Court hours.
2. The defendant xxx25 has engaged in personal attacks with member PITBULL during the Court hours of 9 AM-8 PM.
3. No member is allowed to engage in any arguments related to the Court proceedings outside the Court room.
Judge RuFino; Mr. xxx25 you have a foul mouth. You must respect the Court Hearings. You are an idiot. Now you are in a gag order. The Court will seek a Graded Offense.
SITO Members, plaintiffs
v.
xxx25, defendant.
____________________________/
..................COMPLAINT...........................
This Court declares all the statements on this case are true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant xxx25 has violated the site's CLEAN PAGE ACT. Under this Act, members must maintain and keep their pages free from negative gifts.
2. The defendant's page is filthy. His page has been filthy for the past 2 weeks.
3. The defendant has shown disregard for keeping his page clean.
JUDGE: Clarisbinda; Mr. xxx25 your page is filthy. This is not good. It's time for you to clean your messy page. It is disgusting and ugly. I order you to clean your page within 20 days or be in Contempt of Court.
3/10/25
SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs,
v.
XXX25, defendant.
_____________________________/
....................COMPLAINT............................
This Court declares all statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. DISTURBING OF A COURT HEARING
1. The defendant xxx25 has been charged with a Court hearing, under the rules of the Court.
2. Defendant, during a hearing of the Court, makes
arguments and attacks against member Sir-Skittles.
3. This Court will not tolerate attacks outside the Court during a case hearing.
Judge Fredesbinda; This Court will order you to cease making comments, soliciting, and other illegal activities during a Court session. You are GUILTY of the above charges
SITO members, plaintiffs,
v.
midwestmilf, defendant.
____________________________/
..........................COMPLAINT.........................
This Court declares all the statements on this Complaint to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. Clean Page Act Violation
1. The defendant has violated the Clean Page Act Rule. Under this rule members with 3 or more negative gifts have been defined by this Court as trash.
2. The defendant has violated this rule as her page received 3 negative gifts. The defendant refused to clean her page.
Judge Clarisbinda Sentence. Ms. Midwestmilf. you must clean your page within 30 days. Failure to clean your page will result on Contempt of Court. Jan. 28, 2025
Nasty!
This is your ONLY warning.
New Comment Go to top