Case of CAT52! a/k/a saggy granny
Site members,
Plaintiffs
V
CAT52!,
Defendant.
__________________/
?.......................COMPLAINT.........
This Court declared all the statements to be true based on the evidence
On count 1 THE COURT dismissed without prejudice the charges of: posting a picture of a sexual predator.
Count 2. ATTACKING AN IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The Defendant violated the rule 101 which said: no other member should defame, attack by any means a member under the Court IMMUNITY RULE.
2. DEFENDANT CAT52! attacked IMMUNITY member Sir-Skittles several times.
Judge RuFino: ms CAT52! you have a nasty mouth.Your type of behavior is not acceptable here. Refrain from attacking other members without provocation. An old woman like you should set an example to others members of this site. In addition, in conjunction with the site Intel will investigate on who posted the picture of your sexual predator husband.
I found you guilty of the above charges.
July 19, 2026.
Pitbull Chihuahua.
