Page #33
Pages: #1... #28 #29 #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 ...#163
New Comment Rating: 12 Similar topics: 1.RAND0M BULLSHIT 2.The ORIGINAL "Random Bullshit" thread is now in the Dumpster 3.RANDOM STUFF..... 4.RANDOM STUFF, JUST FUCKING BULLSHIT STUFF 5.RANDOM BULLSHIT Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
Same here, since I was little. I used to get some strange looks in the kitchen at a couple restaurants I worked at.
I do this with pants on if I'm at work.
Note: The conversation's displayed in reverse from having "At the bottom" checked. The reason it's black is my custom color scheme for this website because it was blinding me.
[deleted image]
--------------------------------------- added after 12 hours
Just disregard this, since he's no longer a member.
I'm curious, did you already use the points you received for reporting a "site violation"?
However if you went to his "why blacklisted" page you would see that RTL had a point. There were more than 10 reasons similar to what RTL submitted as abuse.
You saw the referral and you saw the "proof" submitted was only a short dialog between the two. The member, HFWP, never claimed ownership of the pictures he forwarded. All he asked was that RTL to send him some pictures because he (HTWP) was horny. My opinion, there was nothing deceptive in that conversation. My opinion, cando1's pictures are fully visible and available for anyone to view. My opinion, that was a WEAK referral. And finally, my opinion, the voting members that voted to delete were not using logic behind their ABUSE vote. It's all "water under the bridge" as HFWP was deleted/banned.
But still reasons for blacklisting were open for everyone to see and other members might have considered them. RTL might have considered them also, just failed to express correctly in his report. It was quite clear from that data that the member was doing something fishy on a regular basis.
Again, not judging your decision, but since you wanted to discuss this in front of everybody, I'm pointing out the facts that make the picture more complete.
Some folks can make a mountain out of a mole hill and in MY OPINION, too much was read into the entire, short conversation. I think I'm finished.
I would've included more of the conversation if I'd known that might not be good enough right there. The fact that he asks "What member page" when he knows where he got it from, seemed to me like it made it clear that he was pretending they were his own. Now I'll know to be more thorough if I ever report anyone else.
The picture on the bottom was not from cando1, it was from xsusyxqx. There were two others before that I also recognized from other members' pages, one of which he claimed was his wife.
--------------------------------------- added after 7 hours
P.S. - WOW! Take a chill pill.
Regrettably I know a lot about this idiosyncrasy, since I had to guess all the time on my different sites what people complained about and very often they were vague or even misleading and it was apparent they were imagining that I knew what they knew and could see what they were seeing.
To be honest, I don't even remember what I said when I reported him at this point, but as I said, I'll be more thorough if I do one again. In the post you're talking about, I mentioned 'evagionny' posting a pic that looked nothing like her, and claiming it was just a different look. Then I added that another member had PM'd me with the same picture (with the head cropped out). That was him, and this is the pic from her page...
[deleted image]
What's funny to me is all the comments from guys complimenting the girl in the picture, and her thanking them like it's actually her. How is it possible that none of them even noticed it's a younger, very different girl from all of the other pictures?
It was surprising to me to discover there was a great many people like that. I'm more "primitive" person myself. I never went to dating sites to pretend to have a relationship, I was always looking to find a partner or a mate. I was always surprised when girls occurred to be fakes (not necessarily men, often just not who they claimed to be) or had no actual purpose of finding a mate, many of them were just playing games. Running this site gave me better understanding of how seriously fucked up people really are.
Here is my question to you, *IF* you thought you could get away with committing a crime, would you, could you do it AND what do you think the PERFECT CRIME might be?
I watch a lot of forensic police series and documentaries and there is an idea that anyone commiting a crime will always both leave evidential traces of themselves at the scene and also take traces of the crime scene away with them. (see Sandra Bullock's film 'Murder by numbers'. Once you are on the police radar even if only as a family member, workmate, friend, neighbour you are in trouble. To commit the perfect crime you must never even cross the police'radar' in any way at all.
That is why random killings for no apparent motive remain the most difficult to solve.
Maybe if I was inclined to steal your check, I might use it to make a purchase that isn't traceable back to me BUT to write it for funds to be deposited into my account....?????
As for the yo-yos that raid convenience stores only to empty small amounts from a cash till, at least they have a 50/50 chance of pulling it off. The mail carrier's plan was dumb and doomed from the very beginning!
I had a friend when I was younger and he was a doorman at a busy nightclub. He was responsible for collecting cover charges and handing them in at the end of the night. It is very common for these people to skim this money but he had a plan. For ten years he skimmed 8% off of the top. Never more, never less. It wasn't noticed because it was a small amount but if you had 300 guests paying $10, 8% is $240 a night or $4800 a month, $57,600 a year over ten years is $576,000. He didn't put that money up his nose or drink it away but he bought a house and a nice car. I haven't seen him or heard of him in 15 years.
A while ago, I found someone's bank card one night on my way home. I couldn't see anyone around who it might belong to. I could have maybe used it to buy some things online or small shops, but I decided to throw it in a bin. I lost my bank card a few days ago, and the person who found it used it at a McDonalds, a petrol station, and a couple of small shops. The card's been cancelled, and the bank will reimburse me, so this made me think maybe I could have got away with using the card I found, and the person wouldn't be out of pocket.
I think the perfect crime is a crime no one knows has been committed, other than the perpetrator(s) of the crime.
I have always had a love for jewelry, fine jewelry, unique jewelry and there was a time that I couldn't go into a jewelry store without making a purchase. There was a jeweler that I developed a business relationship with, built on trust that he was giving me the best deal possible. A business relationship with a reputable jeweler is almost as important as a relationship with your doctor.
I hadn't been in in months and he called to touch base, yaddah, yaddah, yaddah..... I mentioned at the time that I hadn't been in because I could not justify or afford what I really wanted, I ji-gongus diamond ring. He says, "c'mon in, let's take a look at what we have in inventory". I pay him a visit, I explain what I want, he brings out some stones and now we're discussing prices. No way in hell am I gonna spend that kind of money on a diamond, NO WAY! And I tell him so. Avain, this is a jeweler, a certified gemologist and certified appraiser. This is not his jewelry store so I apparently this means he's able to adjust the price by "so much" but he tells me that he could take one of the pieces of jewelry that I had and appraise high and ultimately, I could claim it lost. For situations like this, the insurance company could settle the claim with a check or provide a stone comparable to what I "lost". Really? It's that easy?
I actually thought about it and in the end, decided, no way! It sounded too easy and things that you think are too easy never really are. Truth be told, I was also concerned that if I did it once, would I want to do it again, and again..... After I sorted through that, then I got pissed with him that he thought I would ever consider doing anything criminal-esque and ¡llegal.
Take, for instance, someone who bought a house in a certain country because the government of this country convinced him that he should borrow money with negligible interest. It did so by constantly bombarding him with advertisements and incentives. And then, say, 10 years later the government increased the rates by 100fold, forc1ng the person to lose everything and live as a scavenger, eating from garbage bins. This person is obliged to commit crime.
Or, take someone who was asked to fight a war because his country was in dire straits. And he bought that and he went to the war front and it is only then that he discovered that his country was invading another country for financial purposes. He fights, he loses a leg, he returns home, his wife had left him, he's a wreck, having lost all beliefs in his supposedly glorious country. Should he commit crime?
Perhaps my examples are fictitious and such situations do not exist and cannot arise in our democratic countries.
New Comment Go to top