Page #1
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5
New Comment Rating: 1 Similar topics: 1.this site 2.Who else likes there dick cheese to smell like cornchips 3.RANDOM STUFF, JUST FUCKING BULLSHIT STUFF 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
But apparently, YOU missed me! Who is thinking about who, you dumb bitch!?
Calm down, calm down.....are you all revved up about not having her Diamond membership renewed on time?
--------------------------------------- added after 16 minutes
If you are so hell bent that I created a fake account, ask admin to check the member's IP for you. Oh, that's right, once you've made up your mind that you're right, you're right even when you're wrong!
As if there's anything about her that I want to see!
I just about puke when I visit the SYC side. But members have it right, she's a #1 CUNT!
Every time there is a negative comment made about her, she accuses you or HR13 of creating a fake account to 'attack' her.
No matter how many times she is told by other members or admin that this is not so, she denies it.
Totally delusional.
Apparently she must feel that the title of "cock juggling thunder cunt from down under (Doyalson)" is a badge of honor.
Hey, can someone explain why she's able to read anything I've written since she blacklisted me? Or why admin allows her to spew her venom on "your" page yet when you use an ambiguous string of words like "cock juggling thunder cunt from down under" and/or "walrus", a thread gets dumpster'd?
It's all good, this is just a dick and cunt site and she certainly is One!
After making this post, the cock juggling thunder cunt from down under has once again, changed her WHY? You're thinking about me, aren't YOU, you frickin whack-a-doodle?
I'm always on your mind.......
Funny, I never referred to any member by their screen name but admin assumed that I was referring to suckit.
It wasn't until we got to Belgium, we stayed at the Brussels Hilton, a breakfast offering of what looked like Campbell's Pork and Beans were served. Pork and Beans for breakfast? Not for me! I prefer Bush's Baked Beans to Campbell's any day and these definitely looked like Campbell's!
When I was on my 2 week hiking trip in Austria/Germany Berchestegarden Park and the German Alpine Huttes we usually had hard salami, and cheese for breakfast. I actually got to like that!!!
1) Europe is so diverse that one cannot draw conclusions from visiting a few countries in a limited amount of time. Even visiting a few places in the same country is not a reliable indicator of what the country's customs are.
2) Eating breakfast in a hotel is not at all an indication of what people eat at home.
3) American pancakes in Europe do not represent the actual thing, just as Italian dressing in the US is very different from any dressing that Italians use.
In hotels in the UK you will generally get something that claims to be a 'Full English Breakfast' the percentage of British people who eat cooked breakfasts at home these days has to be miniscule. I think that maybe hotels serve what they think the guests want to see. Hotels with high tourist intakes especially.
It is virtually always a mistake to try something that is not local. Trying an American Pancake in Belgium, or anywhere outside the US is almost certain to be a mistake. On the continent I always drink coffee, the ability to make a good cup of tea seems to be a skill continentals have yet to master.
Most of us came to the conclusion that the French would probably find Mexican food rather disgusting. But what did we know. As the conversation on that topic was winding down, a person sitting at another table had overheard our conversation and wanted to add her observation.
She had said she was on a recent trip to London, and said she and her husband went to one of the few Mexican Food restaurants in London. She said what goes for Mexican Food, at least in England back then was not what we would consider anything worth eating. What was billed as salsa, was a can of tomato sauce, no spices what so ever. No cheese, and not much of a menu.
She also felt the French would not find Mexican Food that appealing.
In my trips to Europe, I have searched for and did not find any Mexican Food restaurants. I am sure they are there but not as common as here.
"Should the blacklisting option go back to where you could visit the page even though you're blacklisted by that member ?
Cuz I know some people want to leave negative gifts on someone who has blacklisted them,yet they cannot show disapproval of someone's actions cuz they cannot view the page..
what if someone blacklisted you when you were not onsite just after they've dumped shit all over your page,you have no way to respond in kind..
Also, what if someone is posting pics of someone they've banned without their permission,how do you know that they are using your pics?
So go back to being able to dump negative gifts/view pages on someone who has blacklisted you...
Not voting or comments on them..
Cuz what's the point of negative gifts if you can't use them ?
People need to be able to show disapproval in some manner.
Thoughts please!!"
The inability to gift another when you're been blacklisted is only one aspect, now you are unable to take back what was yours.
How many members would like to see the blacklisting program returned to the way it was. All in favor, raise your hand!
A woman in California returned a "live" Christmas tree to Costco for a full refund. Apparently, the shopper was not happy or satisfied that the tree was dead and wanted their money back.
Well I'll be. Duh!
only registered users can see external links
Funnily enough I saw on Amazon Prime yesterday a scene where the waiter offered the customer a glass with a little wine to taste to see if it was acceptable, as waiters do. In this scene the guy drank two large glasses and then said that it was not acceptable as the wine was corked. The Christmas tree woman and the meat customer did exactly the same to my mind.
And in Belgium, prior to having dinner, I inquired about beer. I told the waiter what my taste buds would enjoy, hoping he could make a recommendation. He brought two samples to the table, probably 4 to 6 ounces (120 to 180 ml in each glass) of beer. I made my choice and by the time I drank that and finished the samples, that was enough! Hey, I only drink 1 to 2 beers, I'm a cheap date... That reminds me, the beer was less costly then water!
You are right it is essentially dead once chopped down BUT if I bought a tree took it home and the next morning all the pines had fallen off and it was totally bare I would return the tree and expect a replacement or refund.
However, there is a period of time elapased after purchase when that return is no longer appropriate as what has happened is natural. Don't ask me to specify that period of time though.
This works when people apply common sense..something that appears to be in increasingly short supply at times.
As a consumer, should I EXPECT to buy my "live" Christmas tree at the beginning of December and have it for one month then anticipate a refund one month later? People are ballsy and/or straight up nuts!
I didn't intend to get in this deep
In the Uk the legal benchmark is was the product that you bought fit for it's purpose at the time that you bought it and only if it wasn't or it subsequently failed for reasons beyond your control or expectation within a sensible period do you have you a claim.
The key word is sensible. the tree and meat people did not use common sense.
And yes, the Christmas tree lady was cuckoo for returning her tree after Christmas and CostCo was even to blame for indulging her with this frivolous return.
Sounds like the fellow that bought rare cigars and insured them then reported them lost in a series of small fires. He got a check,got arrested when he cashed it for fraud.
If you look at the short news clip posted above, the tree didn't look to shabby to me!
New Comment Go to top