Sorry. I sent them privately so I can't post them here and I can't delete my post.

Lol no i was just stating this organization has be
en around for awhile

The soldiers would have to be all along on all four sides not just the corners but they're not in Canada so from that I can assume that Canada is the centre of the Earth, something that I've always known.

Ignorance is going to be the cause of humanity's collapse. Ignorance and narrow-mindedness.

that tells us something. Nobodies allowed to freely go to Antactica? I wonder why? Is there something being hidden ? Good point pal

Oh but then, if you accept what is 100% proven, I wouldn't call that a belief. I'd call it accepting facts. Belief, for me, is something we do when we have doubts. Unfortunately, the word doesn't express everything that it tries to capture.

Unfortunately, our societies have given special status to belief and consider it a virtue rather than something we should exercise with great caution. For example, many parents teach their **** to believe their beliefs. They do so when the **** are very young. Then the **** grow up and have great difficulty getting rid of these beliefs. This is called **** indoctrination and is happening everywhere.
--------------------------------------- added after 26 seconds

**** = ch1ld or ch1ldren

So how many planets have you seen ? How many that you saw were round ? How many did you walk right around ? (have you ever walked right round the earth?) No. You didn t answer, so I guess you seen no other planets. Like most of us. So you re on another page in the first place.

Just to confirm, I have actually read a lot of books on this crap. If you don t beleive I can read, then honestly - I ve had, lots of people actually read it to me. At school obviously. Although I obviously wish I didn t have to beleive or listen to it. I just did whatever I could with it . Now if I actually think about it. It s actually like a form of **** abuse. Telling them to beleive all that?

Now, back to the books. I don t care what you say. What you (or I) have read, in theose books. Is total bs. You havent seen the planets, Niether have I . And thats what this, is obviously about. The whole dialog is about what we know or are supposed to beleive. Is bs. The earths supposed to be a 'ball'. Like we ve read or been told! But it simply can t be a ball. For a start, you ve already stated, everywhere we go or you go (around this sphere), up is up. Allways to the North? Always to the so called east? Up = east? That already tell s me it has to be up. BS. If we re on our sphere. In the so called North, up is Northwards. In the south, up becomes -southwards. Even if our 'sphere' is turning or supposed to be turning (god knows whats been making it turn for at least 5-6000 year). North, according to what we ve been, told should always remain , the Northern Hemisphere. Like there, should always be a 'southern' part.Or in facts it s probably easier to TRY and accept the concept of North Est and South skies.

You re already TRYING TO CONFUSE YOUR THINKING. Or taking diferent concepts and put them together. That s because you e simply trying to beleive everything you ve 'read'. And tell yourself that it s all tru. How can you expect it all to be turning (because that s what you re supposed to also beleive). While North will always be North and South lways South. If it turns, each part of this 'ball' will have to get it s 'turn' at being North, East, South etc? Don t try and deny that. Because that s even why we re supposed to have day and night. Don t deny that either. Our 'ball' turns quicker than the sun can follow it. So one part gets iluminated while the other part isn t. (god know s, it s even supposed to all have a SUPER AMASING constant speed, of moving.) Basically what this is about is. What we all beleive just can not be all right. What we re supposed to be accepting is all bs. It contradicts it self.

Lets not go into "true north" and "false north" . Or how other "planets" don t seem to have this 'gravity thing'. While coinsidently, there s also, no life on them. Too funny that , to me. Everyone fell of those planets and landed where it s flat. But some might have gone over 'the edge'. It s too ironic. No gravity, no people, no water. No life. Just a viscious circle. Too funny.

Where as we re on a flat piece of the 'galaxy'. We have water, which hasn t run of the edge. Creatures have managed to stay on, without finding the edge or the end. And then falling off. Probably something to do with the fact that when we re at the edge of a cliff(most of us), don t fall off... Accept it , it simply HAS to be a flat piece of object we live on. Unless you can proove on your own with out any reference to cosmonauts, astronauts Einstien, Julias Ceasor, Isac Newton or the man on the moon and what colour he chose to paint his house. As I stated befor, beleive what YOU want . Beleive what you ve been told.

What did you think of the New s from around the world today? Or yesterday? Or this time last week? Was everything on each news channel, precisely correct. Or was ABC more correct than Fox. Which was maybe pretty similar to CNN. Did it ever occur to you that there never seem to be any 'improvement' on these Cosmic thoughts and beleifs? I think we don t hear any of that, as there s no reason to think anything other than what we ve been told. New s reporters can make plenty of dough, telling people like us about other bombings and tragedies relating to extreme weather, etc. (Ill admit I sometimes take it seriously). Some day, you get the odd 'brave ' News Reporter, THAT tells us something unusual. But yup, it s flat. (excuse my grammer, i tried , lol) FFS...

I m sure I read that also somewhere. However I tend to think it unrealistic or not very practicable. So BS. And therefor can t proove anything, acurately

Then believe what the church preaches.