Page #754
Pages: #1... #749 #750 #751 #752 #753 #754 #755 #756 #757 #758 ...#772
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.A Forum Topic 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
Did you really want those gifts on your page?
No I didn't want the gifts on my page but I am baffled as to how they disappeared.
If you notice, Skittles has gifted Godzillas and if they as the "same person", I don't think that that would be possible.
This particular act, Duo Transcend, is a one million dollar act, even when they had a error that could have crippled or killed the female member.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
...and now I can't get that bizarre image out of my head!
"The social media giant's market capitalization plummeted by $119 billion to $510 billion as its stock price plummeted by 19 percent. At Wednesday's close, Facebook's market cap had totaled nearly $630 billion, according to FactSet.
No company in the history of the U.S. stock market has ever lost $100 billion in market value in just one day, but two came close."
-CNBC
-CNBC
I won't ramble on about examples from the programme, but in a nutshell, images and videos of abvse, hatred and bullying of any kind are acceptable as long as the posts don't include captions promoting or defending them! Fucking terrible!.
only registered users can see external links
I think the fact is that Zuckerberg had no idea that he was creating what would be a monster and that actually he has no idea how to control the moster that he has created. So like a toddler who says 'it wasn't me' when caught out and accused of some misdemeanour his response is 'it's nothing to do with me'.
I bet the moment people begin to succesfully sue Facebook for millions he and his teams will suddenly start to take their responsibility more seriously.
The scariest thing I saw on Facebook before I deleted my profile was the live video posting feature. How on Earth could they possibly censor that fairly and responsibly? In fact, a teenag3r hung herself on the live video streaming not long after it was introduced! Her video went on for around 30 minutes until she died, so where were the fucking censors then? Even worse, some sick bastards recorded it and posted it on Youtube, and they were old enough to know their actions were cruel and totally unacceptable, but they did it anyway simply because they could get some trollish enjoyment from it. They wouldn't dream of going around the streets posting printed pictures of the g!rl dying for the same entertainment value because, if they did, they know full well that they'd get the shit kicked out of them by "censors".
People are starting to believe they can post whatever they like now they've been given the platform for it, but as much as I'd like to pin the blame on social media, I think these sites are just the vehicle, not the driver. Give anyone a gun and they can easily figure out how to fire it, but giving them a gun without teaching them anything about morality and the possible consequences of firing one is our fault, not the gun's.
Just like your, "it's nothing to do with me" quote, our k!ds can easily say and believe, "but it it was on Facebook, so it must be true". Facebook isn't going to correct them. They're only interested in making lots of money. It's us who have that responsibilty, isn't it?
Sorry for the rambling. Too much coffee!
It's not perfect but I have 22 people that call me Uncle east and west of where I live and there are lots of kids involved so I do want to keep in touch through Facebook.
The easy access to places where people can post whatever they want 24/7 with just the click is a great freedom and a great risk.
In the U.S.A the fact that the President stands up and says things that are shown to be untrue and claims that reports in the media are fake news when they are subsequently shown to be true is also making it difficult for some people to tell genuine real news from 'spin'.
It's funny you should mention celebrity and sex too. I think a big factor in how Fartbook being as huge as it is now is down to how it enables the users to be "celebrities" in a way - their photos and other shared personal information being seen by and entertaining anyone and (often) everyone. We even have usernames and alter egos just like celebrities have.
This site does the same thing up to a point too. SYD members entertain others by giving them what they log in here to see and read. The difference is SYD "celebs" show their private life rather than their public life, haha!
The cliche about everyone being famous for 15 minutes is close to being true. Look at the huge number of TV programmes that the public are queueing up to get onto.
I am odd and clearly out of touch because I loathe and never ever watch any of these 'Britain has cake baking on ice' programmes. sorry that is another hobby horse altogether.
Coming back to SYD I think this site offers a useful service in that it allows guys to see the huge range of penises out there and to discover that there are people who think their penis looks good. great for the self esteem.
I hope that Facebook gets totally destroyed.
It's a piece of shit.
I want to talk about Twiggy, the waterskiing squirrel, who is retiring after 39+ years of work! Whoda ever thought that a squirrel would even live that long!?
only registered users can see external links
What always puzzles me with these people with performing **** is how the hell did they ever find out that their **** could do these things?
-CTV News
It was something posted in the Detroit Free Press. They claim is based on how many reports were received per 100,000 people. Chicago had 50,000+ to New York with only 19,000+ reports received. Seems like their theory could be questionable.
only registered users can see external links
I do, however, think that the creator of the contest should split any points that are given to the winner. The winner gets lots of points if there are lots of entries into the contest. By having lots of entries you are creating interest and are contributing to the interest to the contest that you created.
It is 50 points to create the contest and then the contest requires 5 participants at 15 points each. 50 pts + 60 pts (or 75 pts) = 110 pts or 125 pts to start BUT at the end of said contest, admin awards a trophy to the winner valued at 100 pts. When there's more than 10 participants, admin awards the winner a trophy PLUS some points.
In this instance, I kinda look at admin as the "house", like if I was going to take a chance with football squares or sit in and play in poker game, the "house" takes a cut/percentage of all the bets made, basically it is their cut for organizing the function.
And as kebmo indicated, by charging 50 points to the creator to create a contest, that makes the creator give some thought to their creation so that there are not dozens of the same theme contests going on at once. There were several contests recently created that make me shake my head. There's the contest for the pretty daughter, another for the pretty NAKED daughter (like what in the eff is going on in their head
Points are here mostly to balance things a bit and only in a small part for profit. At first I did not sell them at all.
Do you realize that every day points are given off to people for being active on the site? For example, past night 24'397 points were distributed among 2384 members. Not counting points from domination game and bonus points to paid members. 24 thousand points just for activities. Compare that with 400 points that were spent on creation of 8 contests during the same day.
Bella is right though, some of those contests are laughable. Of course, they paid their 50 points, so, according to the rules, they have a right to create them. Thanks for the explanation.
I would suggest though that there be the ability to add a more detailed description as opposed to just the title. There have been a couple contests that I wonder about the creators intent. Some contest I haven't submitted an image for because I wasn't sure if it was correct or not.
But the flip side to this is it may contribute to the problem that bella! mentioned of contest becoming too specific.
I created a contest last week (?) for members that had won some type of site award. In the title, I indicated to please see my blog. Although the contest had 19 participants, I was hoping for more. With more participants, the more points the winner will earn. I'm not sure if members were confused with the title of the contest or if my blog was confusing.
Here are a couple that I thought were too specific.
The 9 month pregnant picture that shows both the pussy AND her face. /contest.php?id=548
Then there is the contest for a guy with a bulge in "print" panties. That's telling me that a guy in white briefs should not even consider participating. /contest.php?id=514
New Comment Go to top