Page #7
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.define straight 2.Denver democrat council woman post on government site all democrats infected with coronovirus should attend every MAGA event 3.Democrats refuse to vote on relief money unless $35 million goes to Kennedy center 4.democrats and associated press close believeallwomen twitter account after Biden sexual assault case came to light 5.democrats refused to vote on relief bill unless $25 million was secured for house paychecks Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
A veteran Harlem lawmaker blasted Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for backing her rival in the Democratic primary and vowed that the socialist firebrand’s “defund the police” agenda will be roundly rejected.
“AOC supports defunding the police. My community opposes defunding the police,” said Assemblywoman Inez Dickens, who is seeking re-election to a fourth term after previously serving in the City Council.
Ocasio-Cortez is backing housing activist Delsenia Glover in the 70th Assembly District against incumbent Dickens.
As The Post reported Monday, AOC has endorsed a slate of insurgent candidates along with the left-wing Working Families Party in a bid to topple seven veteran assembly incumbent Democrats, including Dickens.
What a stupid cunt.
AOC- the same cunt who can't explain basic basic economics, but has a degree in economics. A total muppet.
If Aoc kept quite and was naked,she wouldn't look half bad,but when that mouth opens stupid comes out.
Anyone that thinks defunding the police is a good idea, well they are fucking idiots and morons. But, they do not want to stop there, they want to defund the Country. Look at inflation. We all know russia has very little to do with it as well as gas prices.
Liberalism is a disease. Just a bunch of miserable people.
Men do not have a "flow". A period. Women have that.
A google search can define the job of a tampon. Men don't have menstrual cycles.
Tampons are one method of absorbing menstrual flow during your period. Tampons are designed to be inserted into the vagina with or without an applicator. You may be surprised to learn that the FDA regulates tampons as medical devices. Tampons cleared by the FDA are meant to be used one time and then thrown away.
The idea itself isn't that bad:
"Signed into law by Governor Kate Brown, the Menstrual Dignity Act states that ‘all public institutions of education’ must provide free pads and tampons in school bathrooms starting this fall. With the growing awareness of period poverty, the goal is to help students who may be unable to access or afford such products and ensure that successful learning isn’t prevented from that essential need. The bill states that schools must have menstrual products available in a minimum of two restrooms for this upcoming school year."
But adding that they "need to consider all-gender access to the products" sounds like they are asking for trouble. If this is done by a Democrat, that person needs to have their head examined. But I see the possibility that is was a Republican, who saw a chance to instigate a nice outrage.
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
Good lord I just google it she’s that old and ugly she should be wearing the tampon box over her head to hide her face so I don’t turn to stone when I look at her
with her age,and college degrees and such,she really could have been a good thing .but her head is in some other hemisphere.
She has no real understanding of how the real world works.
We even have a supreme court justice that was placed there because she is a black woman, BUT even SHE could not define woman.
Even GOOGLE gets it right.
wom·an
/ˈwo͝omən/
Learn to pronounce
noun
noun: woman; plural noun: women
an adult female human being.
- adult
- female
- human being
They didn't ask for the dictionary definition. If they did, they are stupid.
She's a judge, not a linguist. If you are going to give dictionary definitions,
for the three underlying concepts, you're stupid too.
When Marsha Blackburn asked Ketanji Brown Jackson to define "woman," she said
"I'm not a biologist.". If she wanted the constitutional definition, there is none and
Ketanji Brown Jackson tried to explain that. Maybe the 3 judges Republicans put in
are at that level of stupid, but Ketanji Brown Jackson is a real judge.
No biology needed to define "woman".
"A type of engine, adjective
1. motor
2. machine"
Dictionary definitions just give synonyms or the meaning of a word.
Women ---- adult female human being
Female ---- a female animal or plant
(note that 'female' is used to describe 'female'. That causes infinite regression)
Neither “women” nor “sex” are words that appear in the Constitution
We can find: "Adjective denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) which can be fertilized by male gametes."
It is the description for the female SEX. This says nothing about gender.
And this definition excludes woman after menopause, because they don't produce gametes anymore. So the official Oxford definition is also wrong.
GENDER:
"Either of the two sexes (male and female), especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones. The term is also used more broadly to denote a range of identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female.
"a condition that affects people of both genders"
Members of a particular gender considered as a group.
social interaction between the genders"
the fact or condition of belonging to or identifying with a particular gender.
video ads will target users based only on age and gender"
2. (in languages such as Latin, French, and German) each of the classes (typically masculine, feminine, common, neuter) of nouns and pronouns distinguished by the different inflections which they have and which they require in words syntactically associated with them. Grammatical gender is only very loosely associated with natural distinctions of sex.
Go back to when the constitution was written and see the definition of gender and sex that was used.
But they didn't write those definitions down in the constitution, they explicitly
wrote a document giving all sorts of personal freedoms to people and all sorts of checks and balances for the government not to infringe on those freedoms.
Off course the founders didn't know that we at any point would be able to give people hormones and hormone blockers and could do surgery to change a dick into a pussy and a flat chest into boobs, without the patient bleeding out and in most cases turn boys into convincing girls and even into beauty pageant winners. But I'm sure they knew about gay men. Those guys in wigs all had their boy bitches to suck their cocks at their disposal.
only registered users can see external links
Because saying 'adult FEMALE human being' is not explaining anything.
And the Oxford dictionary definition of 'gender'. (google's standard)
Now all of a sudden it's BS?
After you wanted the judge to give dictionary definitions?
"A human being born with a vagina"? Is that what you want to hear?
What does that say about the right to have a sex change operation?
Is the constitution saying anything about that?
Off course not, because they didn't have that back then.
How about human rights? Lot's about that in the constitution!
Find me something applicable in it then. It's your constitution!
You really want to hear it meet me on my page in pm...
Do not worry you will be in a safe place...
Wokeness is the only thing going for the Democrats at the moment.
But, I don't see Biden saying much woke things and doing even less.
He could legalized weed with one signature, but he doesn't do it.
He speaks out against banning abortion and that's it. 'Too late, sorry.'
Harris is nowhere to be seen (at least from where I live, but do you see her anywhere?), so whatever personal ideas she has, doesn't do anything.
But the primary wins or likely wins of Summer Lee, John Fetterman and Jamie McLeos-Skinner against massive PAC money supporting corporate Blue Dogs, is a good signal the voters are done with right-wing Democrats fucking up Biden's promises to improve the lives of working people.
For people who don't know, Republicans are putting up massive amounts
of PAC money to support the corrupt, corporate right-wing Democrats.
A Democratic politician taking money from Republicans, is that a Democrat?
What would Republicans say about a Republican politician taking money from Democrats?
You have not seen all of KH's word salads. I bet you have seen a few. That is why you do not see her, they hide her with the rest of the idiots.
Your last paragraph is sketchy at best.
I wouldn't call her an idiot, I would just call her useless and pointless.
How is the last paragraph sketchy?
It's reality. The standard corporate 'centrist' Democrats are getting millions and millions for their campaigns, from corporate donors and Political Action Committees, where Republicans put in a big part of the money.
Not just now. This is an article from 2018:
only registered users can see external links
It's how Shontel Brown won from Nina Turner:
only registered users can see external links
Pro-Israel lobbying group Aipac secretly pouring millions into defeating progressive Democrats
only registered users can see external links
State Rep. Summer Lee, won against anti-union attorney Steve Irwin, who had lot's of money from the Republican backed AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee):
only registered users can see external links
Private Equity-Funded Super PAC Buys Attack Ads Benefiting Kurt Schrader Against Progressive Challenger Jamie McLeod-Skinner:
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
John Fetterman vs. Every Predatory Financier in America
only registered users can see external links
G.O.P. Donors Back Manchin and Sinema as They Reshape Biden’s Agenda: only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Who started with dictionary definitions?
Why?
And why would I go to a democrat with a difficult question?
I know I would get word salad!
The six different ways in which electricity is produced:
- chemical
- friction
- heat
- light
- magnetism
- pressure
only registered users can see external links
Probably not the straight answer you are looking for.
Can you answer this, why is it ok for us to use foreign oil rather than our own. Usually our own is cleaner and so is Canada's. Nope we gotta stop that damn pipeline, but it is ok for russia to use a pipeline. What sense does all that BS make. Let me help, lunacy.
1, if those countrys didn't sell oil,they have NOTHING ELSE viable to trade in order to support themselves. They would be the equal of a 3rd world country.
It is ok to buy their oil as LONG AS IT IS CHEAPER than our own. When it gets higher,turn on our own spiquets and let them stew in theirs a while and they will come around.
I like Bill Cosbys idea on oil . a bushel of wheat should cost the same as a barrel of oil. They eat,we burn oil, so simple enough.
Also,by using their oil, it helps reduce the pesky fines the liberal government trys to inflict on domestic drillers for minor issues .
- What is the root of 64?
- What is the capital of Venezuela?
- What is the most used ingredient of a baker?
Maybe Republicans are stupid enough to ask such questions, but if a supreme court judge nominee with any brains gets a question like that, they are not stupid enough
to give a dictionary definition. Not even your judges are that stupid.
Liberals "burn" dictionarys and books to prevent anyone from knowing how they are slowly,methodically changing basic definitions of words.
Take the word retard or retarded.Used to be in reference to the timeing on a engine's ignition system.Then it became a way to discribe someone who aint quite right by no fault of their own.Now it is suddenly a taboo word to say.
While right-wing politicians are doing exactly that!
DUH!
tecsan: "You got that right, now explain it to the progressive democrats."
Because it doesn't say anything about the people who had a ding-a-long
and had it replaced by a surgeon for a hoo-hoo, or vice versa.
Whatever definition, it doesn't say anything about people's rights
to have their hoo-hoo or ding-a-long replaced.
If you agree with CAT's definition:
- Man has a ding-a-long
- Woman has a hoo-hoo
That means you agree that trans-women are women and trans-men are men.
Marsha Blackburn just like CAT tricked you in agreeing with the definition
which claims trans-women are women and trans-men are men.
(but she's a judge, not a comedian and not a biologist)
If a definition should exclude 'fake' but sexually effective ding-a-long's and hoo-hoo's,
it should be in the definition.
New Comment Go to top