Page #1
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#228
New Comment Rating: 2 Similar topics: 1.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 2.A Forum Topic 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF,, ANY STUFF III 5.NEW MONGO STUFF, OLD MONGO STUFF, ANY MONGO STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
The Movie
Directed by Brett Ratner
a thug like his supporters.
Melania director Brett Ratner pictured cuddling woman in Epstein files
only registered users can see external links
But we knew that.
9 years ago, six women accused filmmaker Brett Ratner of sexual harassment or misconduct
only registered users can see external links
Poor person gets caught stealing a wallet -> Could get 1 year in jail.
CEO gets caught stealing a many millions from people's pensions -> The company pays a fine, maybe CEO gets fired, gets to keep his bonus and possibly exits with a golden parachute.
only registered users can see external links
Since most of Trump's (former) best friends are implicated, QAnon is now 'vewy qwiet'.
Trump is the quintessential “carpetbagger”, a wealthy, opportunistic Northerner,
who exploits the Southerners. I cannot feel sorry for you, if you are this stupid.
And why during TRumps first term did things improve for the southern people? At least all the communities around here improved. Second term, he is trying to fix the root problems of America,and getting alot of static because he fighting fire with fire.
The root problem in America today is the incredible wealth inequality, and he has exacerbated that. He could have fixed some trade problems with targeted tariffs,
I am not against them in general, but the way he used them is so incredibly dumb.
That's the problem with voting for a president who doesn't understand anything.
If he at least would have brought in some experts, it could have turned out OK,
but he brought in inept loyalists, who just do all the stupid shit he tells them to do.
He's trying not to go to prison.
But let's get back to my posting.
Did I mention the you have the
strategy of diverting as much as
possible, just like your heil Hitler?
MELANIA
SHITY MOVIE
BY A SHITTY DIRECTOR
ABOUT A MAIL BRIDE,
AND ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT
“MELANIA” IS AS VACUOUS AS ITS SUBJECT
only registered users can see external links
😆
All I am hearing is crickets.
IF Trump curled up and died in the morning, Melania would have a good chance at a place in government simply because of her presence in the White house as first lady.
She doesn't even like living there, and almost never is.
Do you ever see her look happy?
With your dumb-ass regime, I give it a good chance that she would get a position
in the government, for that dumb reason alone. Does she have even 1 real skill,
that you can point to, that would actually qualify her for that?
'DEI' for former Eastern European model trophy wives?
it's a ego thing.
Damn, you're living in the middle ages.
Do you understand the humiliation she suffers from being required to support
her husband, while he has been shown to have payed off a model and a porn-star to hide his sexual indiscretions, while she was pregnant, have to call his perversions "locker room talk", know that his name is the Epstein files many thousands of times, with lots of clear claims that he was cheating on her,
with under@ge girls?
Do you think she needs evidence? She knows who she married, by now.
What rock are you living under, thinking that her 'ego' was boosted in any way?
If you cannot see the question "When will you finally die?" in her eyes,
every time she looks at her husband, you are blind as a bat.
Damn, I would almost go see her movie, if wasn't such a witch herself.
Besides if she hated him as much as you make out like she does, why hasn't she got a divorce yet? that would bring him down to his knees.
I hear crickets.
The type of Melania just wants a wealthy man, who gives her a luxurious life. Some might want to be a first lady like Jackie Kennedy, who was respected by her husband, and got to be First Lady as a position with at least some substance, in a modern way.
Melania is just dragged along as a prop. And from day one, she got disrespected by her husband directly and humiliated by his actions indirectly. Not even the gold-digger tradwife that you make her out to be, has the lack
of agency, to accept this level of humiliation.
Why hasn't she got a divorce yet? Prenups? Fear? Have you seen what happens to people who are disloyal to Trump?
Trump should have kicked the bucket by now, the way his health has been deteriorating. Some doctors only give him a few months. No way that he still has many years. Melania thinks she can wait it out. That time is not worth the risk.
I can't remember which order they came in,I could research it I guess but I think "Day after Tomorrow" or "The Village" was the last 2 movies I saw in a theater. cost to much and "The Village" took what coulda been a good story and made a mess of it. todays movies are boring,all fake and to much dei and such for my interest. Now if they made movies like "Bullit" or "True Grit" nowadays, I might be interested.
only registered users can see external links
Did you guys know that,
despite the promises that
elections are free and run
by local authorities and
verified by independent observers,
they are, in reality, under the total control of the taste?
I'm mentioning this because putin
says he never interferes, but he does?
Do you agree
I am surprised and would not be surprised if a voting location hasn't been or might be a terrorist target in the future here in the US. Soft targets.
I am also willing to bet that russians wouldn't mind confirming they are legal russian citizens in order to vote. Unlike some idiots here in the US that think it is RACIST to ask for a legal id to vote.
Don't bet on anything.
So you agree that the Russian federation having total control is a bad thing?
only registered users can see external links
Approximately 300,000 to 350,000 U.S. service members (often referred to as GIs, though this term was popularized in WWII) died in the European Theater of Operations during the two World Wars combined, with the overwhelming majority occurring in World War II.
--------------------------------------- added after 69 seconds
Or do you think like the Clown and think they were suckers?
Things are a bit different now and a person like Hitler could not gain the control of so much as was done back in more primitive times.
Europe has some fucked up ways or people woulda never left if it was a utopia. I think religious freedom is what brought some over here in the beginning. My german ancestors came over to start a new and better life, something must not have suited them in germany then.
That's nice to hear from you, honestly. Thanks for saying that.
Those advancements could have been achieved without an ideology of hate.
An ideology of hope would have created better, without all the suffering.
Hitler wasted incredible resources on this ideology of hate.
All those resources could have been invested much wiser.
Hitler's actions put the world back decades.
Do you know what put the world back in order? Socialist methods.
- Welfare states (healthcare, pensions, unemployment insurance)
- Public housing
- Nationalization of some industries
- Strong labor rights
- Progressive taxation
All over the world, leaders agreed that these socialist methods were needed to rebuild the economy and society, and it resulted in the fastest recovery ever. And then after, these measures were kept in place to recover all the debt that was created by the war and the recovery. It created prosperity like we have never seen.
And then the greedy demands of the rich were listened to again.
Taxes for the rich were combined with austerity for the working class.
And now the working class is getting poorer and poorer, and angry.
And the powerful use an ideology of hate to distract the people from their failures.
This is exactly what Hitler did, and people are falling for it AGAIN.
That's because people like you are unable to learn from history.
And that's why you are parroting this idea that Hitler created progress.
And maybe he did, for a short while, and then it turned to UTTER DESTRUCTION.
Which is what always happens in the world, when people pick leaders like that.
Why don't you learn from how the world recovered after that stupid mistake?
I've met no one who supports trumpists. Same thing in Rome. Same in London. In fact, I've met nobody during the last year or so who sympathises even remotely with maga.
That's all a fact.
What does phart do?
He diverts the topic entirely talking of what "his ancestors did a few hundred years ago".
I'll analyse not this response further but it's obvious that his only means of responding is by entirely diverting the topic. Much like what his fuhrer is doing, as well as his minions.
And he expects a response. lol
And when you go back to the original posting, he diverts again
And again
And again
And again....
It's all written down, so it can be checked.
Poor phart, his responses resemble feces 💩 coming out of reactionary orifices.
You can't deny it.
And you're proud to be so.
Disgusting
YOUR SUPPORT FOR HITLER!
(AND ALL OTHER DICTATORS
LIKE YOUR CURRENT FÜHRER.)
Glad you fell for my trap again.
I just wanted to show to the
good people here, like
CAT52! and Ananas2xLekker,
what kind of inhuman dirty fascist
you are, not that they had any
doubt at all. You do not belong
to the human species, you've
nothing in common.
Don't drink Fanta, don't fly in a jet plane and don't call law enforcement just to name a few things affected by hitler. Never said he was a good guy. Just saying good can be found even from his work, sad you can't see the point.Matter of fact it proves how fucking Stupid you really are.
for a little chocolate mint on the side,
I go for the main course of 'as good as I can possibly find'.
ChatGPT: Al Capone did NOT come up with the idea of soup kitchens. Soup kitchens existed long before Capone’s time. They were started in the late 19th century and early 20th century as charitable efforts to feed the poor, especially during economic crises. For example, during the Great Depression (1929–1939), many soup kitchens were already operating across the United States. What Capone did do was fund a very famous soup kitchen in Chicago during the Great Depression in 1931. He reportedly served free meals to thousands of people, partly as a public relations move to improve his image during a time when he was notorious for crime. That’s probably why people mistakenly associate him with “inventing” the idea, but he only popularized it locally in Chicago.
Still ridiculous that Chicago needed a gangster for some social safety net.
"You are just unwilling to accept the fact that good can come from anywhere"
was clearly related to my comments too.
Maybe you would even agree that communism achieved some good things. This is a list that you might agree on for at least some points. It's picked with
a capitalist perspective:
1. Rapid Industrialization
Many communist countries industrialized quickly, turning backward economies into industrial powers.
Example: The USSR went from a largely agrarian country to a global industrial and military power in just a few decades.
2. Space Exploration
The space race was heavily driven by communist states.
Example: Sputnik (first satellite) and Yuri Gagarin (first human in space) were huge achievements for humanity, not just ideology.
3. Scientific and Technological Advances
Significant investments in basic science, medicine, and technology came out of communist countries.
Example: Cuba has medical research and biotech innovations that are exported worldwide.
4. Infrastructure Projects
Big infrastructure projects like dams, railways, and industrial plants were often built efficiently.
Example: Massive hydroelectric projects in the USSR and China boosted energy capacity. High speed rail in China is primarily government-controlled and funded, and far ahead of the American rail system.
5. Universal Education
Basic literacy and education programs were highly effective.
Example: Soviet literacy campaigns raised literacy rates from ~40% to over 90% in decades. That’s a practical skill everyone can appreciate.
6. Public Health Achievements
Some communist systems built strong public health systems that improved survival rates.
Example: Cuba has one of the best doctor-to-patient ratios in the world and very low infant mortality compared to its economic peers.
7. Resistance to Colonialism and Foreign Domination
Communist movements sometimes helped countries gain independence or resist foreign control.
Example: Vietnam defeating French and later U.S. forces, Cuba’s support for anti-colonial movements in Africa.
In general; the USSR forced the US to technically develop, by competition.
And to beat them, the US mostly used government funding too.
That was my point. You're a fascist all the way to the bone.
No surprises here.
Your answer confirms precisely what the whole world this about you and your likes.
Maga-asshole-americans
ARE UNWELCOME
everywhere in the world,
except Belarus, Russia, Hungary
and other dictatorships.
You aint welcome in America far as I am concerned but you know what? If you came here, long as you had money to spend, you wouldn't be ran off. We will gladly take your money.
And your pathetic little kingdom would be more than happy for me to come over and spend my money there as well. It's all about the money.
So they are already having issues with charging electric cars?
Sheesh,what about in 5 years? The power company are not permited to build new power plants.Solar and wind are going to be important to keep the grid up. But that didn't work in Texas did it?
They make a lot of energy in Texas,but how many folks died over the winter this past 1?
Angel1227!
So a private, for profit, company did not plan on a hard winter so their production of electricity was not sufficient? And this utility, regulated by the states, failed to meet the demands? This state (Texas) governed by Repukers was not regulated correctly so this company spent less on production and got richer because of it? This sounds very much like a Repuker business idea.
I fault the power companys in texas to a point but I also fault the citizens for lack of preparedness.
Face it, sometimes you need regulation, especially for basic facilities like power.
And I then mentioned the issues in texas with electricity.
What everyone is missing here is the fact there is NOT enough electricity being produced to meet CURRENT demand.As Ananas has indicated.So imagine if you will,5-10 years from now,when there is GREATER demand? What a mess we are in for.
Regulation is not the solution. that is how you GOT TO THIS POINT. To many regulations preventing new power plants being built and trying to snuff out coal,a effective energy source.
You think that if they are running short they won’t try to catch up? The regulations you protest are there to protect the people and the environment. But, knowing how you think, fuck that. Let coal continue to pollute. We’ll be dead by the time our grandkids die of poisoned air.
only registered users can see external links
Only 2 under construction according to this chart.
only registered users can see external links
The US shut down how many? lets see
only registered users can see external links
Now, we shut down 39 and we are building 2. Does that sound like regulations are helping any? 2, there are 50 states. So state regulation is not changing anything where it may be either.
If you want coal gone,you need to have a replacement handy before hand.
Nuclear power is not the solution. There are 80 sites in the United States where nuclear waste is stored. Some of it is stored temporary in a location that is not safe long term. The best uranium sites are already running out and it's getting ever more expensive to mine the stuff.
That waste has to be looked after for the next 20,000 to 1M years, before it's safe. Humanity probably kills itself before that or there might be a few survivors that don't know how to keep the waste safe and radiation will finish them off. But who cares, right?
only registered users can see external links
Like nuclear is the only alternative to coal.
I just used nuclear here because MOST tree huggers-liberals,think nuclear is the answer.And it has Ooodles of issues that take Many years to deal with.
Actually, I even prefer fossil fuels over nuclear, even though I'm a tree hugger-liberal. Nuclear might be a bit better on carbon emissions when the reactor is built, but building new ones creates so much emissions, it takes 20 years to recover.
Another problem is that nuclear reactors take ages to start up and stop again, which is not practical as backup for solar and wind. Fossil fuels are at least needed until we have enough geothermal, hydro (incl. wave), biofuel, biogas, hydrogen, chemical storage (formic acid), thermal energy storage, battery storage and whatever I forgot or they think up next.
Then there is off-course the waste and the risk.
Eh so more electric cars will reduce demand?
I know you are not a engineer,but even you should be able to figure out that can't work.
groas violations of human rights, so the US or Europe don't need them as an ally.
If they can't sell us oil ,they will make their money on interest from loans.
We could afford to use fossil fuels if we could finish our pipelines and drill in otherwise useless lands like up north in alaska where there is nothing but woods.
The alaskan pipeline built long ago,was supposed to be such a wildlife disaster,ha,the animals love it,it is warm near the pipeline.
California has MILES of coast line,Why are they not looking into this tech?
only registered users can see external links
Instead of wasting all that coast line for half naked people to lay around and spread covid,there could be power plants there!
NO pollution! No noise that is not already there,and erosion control! WOW,
Kansas,could be using wind and solar to help of course.
Another non polluting power source,
only registered users can see external links
When I build a green house,yep,I will use geothermal to help with temp control.
Every bit you can use of it is better than none at all.
Here are some fun do-it-yourself builds on YouTube.
I had seen them before and it made me regret living next to a stationary ditch.
Maybe there are some ideas you can use:
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
I DO NOT quite understand the amount of AMPS he is getting from that washing machine motor.
only registered users can see external links
How many Chernobyl’s do you know? One in the states, one in Japan, and one in Russia. Here, in Miami-Dade county, FP&L has been operating the local one over 50 yrs. Same in other cities around the state. And no pollution
You don't hear about the Mcquire plant here in NC getting to hot but it did a few years ago. The tree huggers were angry because a type of fish was dieing from getting caught in the cooling system water.So they put a screen over the intake. Worked fine for a while. Until the screen clogged up with little fishes.A employee told me about it.
Here is a long list of potential accidents and how to deal with them
only registered users can see external links
Yea,I know,I got dizzy after 10 minutes of readin!
I can't see a coal plant being any where near as dangerous to operate
They can't even take in water, without sucking up all the fishes
According to the Rainforest Action Network. For decades, climate change has been a global crisis that will impact every single person and living being on this planet. Now, according to the latest UN climate report, we have less than 10 years to cut global emissions in half.
Burning fossil fuels isn’t just bad for the climate, these industries also violate countless fundamental human rights. From frontline communities facing a fossil fuel pipeline on their land to Indigenous people facing fires in the Amazon to worker rights violations on palm oil plantations, the industries fueling climate change are also fueling injustice.
Coal, tar sands, and fracked gas show everything that’s wrong within the fossil fuel industry. These extraction practices are harming people and planet every day, and big banks are fueling this destruction of the planet and negligence of life.
So what’s so bad about coal, tar sands, and fracked gas? Basically everything, from start to the finish these fossil fuels are disastrous. For decades, climate change has been a global crisis that will impact every single person and living being on this planet. Now, according to the latest UN climate report, we have less than 10 years to cut global emissions in half.
Burning fossil fuels isn’t just bad for the climate, these industries also violate countless fundamental human rights. From frontline communities facing a fossil fuel pipeline on their land to Indigenous people facing fires in the Amazon to worker rights violations on palm oil plantations, the industries fueling climate change are also fueling injustice.
Coal, tar sands, and fracked gas show everything that’s wrong within the fossil fuel industry. These extraction practices are harming people and planet every day, and big banks are fueling this destruction of the planet and negligence of life.
So what’s so bad about coal, tar sands, and fracked gas? Basically everything, from start to the finish these fossil fuels are disastrous.
Like I said, “What you don’t see can be more dangerous.”
only registered users can see external links
chernobyl didn just happen and stop.It is still happening today.
Smog will go away at some point.
coal smoke can be filtered.Try filtering radiaton.
So we only would need half that exclusion zone filled with solar panels
and that would cost about 78 Billion Euro's. That would raise our national debt from 56.3% of GDP to 66.2% of GDP.
Jobs for all our unemployed people will pull that debt down soon enough.
Accidents happen. Even if the chance is 1:1M (historically proven it's much higher), when you multiply that risk by the number of nuclear power plants required, something catastrophic will happen at some point. Such catastrophes could cost more than the complete energy transition.
That's not worth it, because nuclear power is only a temporary solution, because the uranium will run out at some point. It's already becoming more and more expensive to mine the stuff.
Even if all those problems didn't exist, it still takes 10 years before any nuclear power plant has compensates his own build. But it first takes 10 years to build any. Then after 20 years, they are just as CO2 effecient as wind and solar. That's too late. We need to lower CO2 emissions ASAP.
Anyone with some money to spare can invest in their own solar panels,
lower their costs and be less dependent on power companies.
It's nice to have air-conditioning in a heat wave, when the government
is telling you not to use power or you can't afford it when power companies are charging you 100x the normal rate.
only registered users can see external links
There are al sorts of natural disasters, but it can also be a terrorist attack or a hacker or just basic human error.
BTW, instead of Kansas I could have picked West Virginia
--------------------------------------- added after 4 minutes
As far as anything else, we have to trust security will prevail. Every thing is a crapshoot. Hopefully we don’t roll snake eyes,
only registered users can see external links
I also don't like nuclear energy and my arguments are in line with the science on climate change. That uranium has to be mined, which also emits CO2.
A nuclear power plant takes a lot of energy to be built and maintained.
Then afterwards we have to keep the waste safe for the next 20,000 years.
On the short term nuclear is about as energy/CO2 efficient as wind power and even less than solar. In the long term nuclear has a horrible energy/CO2 efficiency, because keeping the waste safe also costs energy. Also, building nuclear power plants takes a long time and lots of materials. It takes about 10 years before a nuclear power plant compensates his own build. That's about 1-1.5 years for wind energy and 2 years for solar. However solar is cheaper
on maintenance.
Other than that, I agree with most of what you said.
All energy technology costs money, materials, energy and land to build and maintain. All energy technology has downsides like pollution, mineral shortages, exploitation of people and CO2 emissions. We just need to stop with the worst energy technologies first and expand on the best ones the most.
It doesn't require completely changing our life or have impact on the quality of our life. However climate change already impacts our life and it will only get worse. We can either choose to accept some changes now and prevent total catastrophe later or we can deny the truth until catastrophe proves us wrong.
New Comment Go to top