Page #4
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#226
New Comment Rating: 2 Similar topics: 1.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 2.A Forum Topic 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF,, ANY STUFF III 5.NEW MONGO STUFF, OLD MONGO STUFF, ANY MONGO STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
For Leo and ananas to sit there and claim Trump is doing something terriable, read this section,
"Denmark banned the use of FKU tests on Greenlandic families; the decision came not too long after Trump started voicing plans for a Greenland takeover. The timing inevitably raised eyebrows, with some Greenlanders believing that this sudden and speedy policy U-turn on a longstanding grievance was rooted in Danish fears about US involvement."
UNTIL TRUMP got involved and suddenly denmark started banning these terrible actions. UM< Draining the swamp?
I guess Leo and ananas are proud to support a Danish government that installed birth control devices in Greenlands women and girls to reduce birth rates and financial burdens on the danish government.
Wow, leo,where is that empathy now?
"In the Sixties and Seventies, thousands of Greenlandic women and girls, some as young as 12, were fitted with intrauterine devices (IUDs), without their knowledge or consent. The policy was an attempt to slow down population growth in Greenland (which at the time had one of the highest birth rates in the world) and therefore lessen the potential financial burden on Denmark; it’s thought to have impacted around half of the island’s women of childbearing age between 1966 and 1970."
Historical Context (Early to Mid-20th Century)
State-Sanctioned Eugenics: From 1907 to the 1970s, 33 states had eugenics laws that authorized the forced sterilization of individuals deemed "unfit" or "feebleminded". Over 60,000 people were forcibly sterilized under these laws.
Targeting Minorities: Racial minorities were disproportionately affected. In North Carolina, Black women were the most targeted group for forced sterilization between 1937 and 1966. In the 1960s and 70s, Mexican-American women in Los Angeles were coerced into tubal ligations, sometimes without their knowledge or under duress while in labor.
Indian Health Service: A 1976 study by the U.S. General Accounting Office found that between 1973 and 1976, the Indian Health Service (IHS) sterilized 3,406 American Indian women without their proper consent.
Fannie Lou Hamer: The civil rights activist Fannie Lou Hamer was given a hysterectomy without her consent in 1961 while undergoing surgery for a uterine tumor. This common practice of unwanted hysterectomies on Black women in her community was referred to as the "Mississippi appendectomy".
However, don't come now and try to use it as a reason why the United States should invade another country's territory. What the Clown is proposing is a crime to the world order and by just discussing it should be treated as a declaration of war. He is despicable. Anyone that agrees with him is too.
E -rratic
M - indless
O - afs
C - rying
r - entlessly
a - bout
T - rump.
under civil rights law. That means they cannot discriminate against protected classes,
but political affiliation or occupation (like being an ICE agent) is not a protected class.
I will follow up on it as hilton says they are cutting ties, if it shows up they didn't, boycott that chain because they have a bunch of places under their umbrella.
However, there might be more people who like that place now.
And maybe they have now reason to boycott the Hilton.
Your movement is declining fast. Even the QAnon shaman now hates Trump.
"Peace on Earth", he says.
And moments later he kills 32 Cubans in Venezuela.
ok a little googling indicates they were CUBAN MILITARY and intelligence personal. UM< that makes my question even more important? planning some kind of a attack?
only registered users can see external links
"Trump further stated that US oil companies would "go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money for the country",
There is real progress for a sinking country
Why is that strange. I would understand Cuba and Venezuela to be logical allies.
There were also Chinese officials there. What mess would it have become,
if they would have been killed?
I have the suspicion that when Trump says "start making money for the country",
he doesn't mean Venezuela.
Why do you keep thinking that a military attack on a country ever improve things?
I don't even think that it would be good, if Putin would have Trump assassinated.
No matter how bad Trump is, your country needs to figure out this shit for itself.
It only creates lots of chaos, when a country suffers a leadership vacuum.
Can't you learn anything from history?
The Cubans in venezuela were security force for Maduro. The US has no right to start this war or kill them. It's illegal.
--------------------------------------- added after 7 minutes
Hiring Cubans or Chinese or any other people for the country's head is a matter that only the country has a say on. The US has no rights over it.
Moreover, the country, Venezuela, banned American businesses a few years ago because they don't want them. It's their right to do so, so long as they don't interfere with another country. The US has no say on it.
Whether a country needs the US protection or not is first and foremost a decision taken by that country.
In the future, countries may need protection by asking China to provide it. It's their right to do that. The US has no right to tell, say, Sweden that they should not ask China. In fact, the way things go, it might happen.
and bans trade with the US. Your massive debt will bankrupt you within a year.
We have 550 million people and about your GDP. We can obliterate you economically.
I'm sure that China will love to take over the alliance.
America has recovered when it had governments filled with qualified people.
Trump has fired al those qualified people and replaced them with loyal idiots.
Your country doesn't have any recovery strength left, because of that.
Europe is helping the US to stay solvent, because we fear what happens if it collapses. However, if we need to defend ourselves by causing your collapse,
that would be easy. It would hurt us too, but not as much as you.
Meanwhile, the EU is working hard to make us more independent,
so it won't hurt as much, when we need to defend ourselves.
We would never stand a chance against your military, I know that,
but the US is controlled by your billionaires, who are not loyal to your ideology,
but only care about their bottom line. They will take out your regime, when it
no longer serves their interests.
Thanks Trump for lowering gas prices
Just checked, oil is 56.24 a barrel
whole sale gas is 1.68
only registered users can see external links
"In other countries, it happens; governments fall over scandals, that with Trump,
they wouldn't even be top 10 controversies."
Indeed, in the last 10 years alone, my gouvernement fell 3 times over 'scandals':
1. Rutte III Cabinet
- Period: 26 October 2017 – 15 January 2021 (caretaker since 15 Jan 2021)
- Date fallen: 15 January 2021
- Reason: The government collapsed after a highly critical report on the childcare benefits scandal (toeslagenaffaire) undermined confidence in the coalition, leading to the collective resignation of ministers.
2. Rutte IV Cabinet
- Period: 10 January 2022 – 7 July 2023
- Date fallen: 7 July 2023
- Reason: The coalition of VVD, D66, CDA and ChristenUnie could not reach agreement on immigration and asylum policy, especially on limiting family reunification for asylum seekers. These irreconcilable differences caused the entire cabinet to resign.
3. Schoof Cabinet
- Period: 2 July 2024 – 3 June 2025 (caretaker since 3 Jun 2025)
- Date fallen: 3 June 2025
- Reason: The far‑right PVV party left the ruling coalition over disputes on asylum and migration policy, stripping the government of its majority. Prime Minister Dick Schoof subsequently submitted the cabinet’s resignation.
The government admits it failed, and places the responsibility back on the voters,
to choose new representatives.
You need a strong immigration policy.
Is the childcare benefits scandal related to keeping up kids on the government dole for parents that can't afford them?
Rutte was our corporate right-wing prime minister.
Nice that you understand what idiots they are.
At least they had to pick from 27 parties. You picked wrong from 2.
No one was against strong immigration policy.
It was just a matter of keeping it lawful and making it effective.
The VVD pulled the plug, because of political games.
They thought that they could achieve more with the PVV.
That turned into a complete shit-show, and collapsed in a year.
That's because the Asylum and Immigration Minister Marjolein Faber (PVV) has consistently ignored or refused to follow critical advice from expert advisory bodies, like the Council of State, the Council for the Judiciary, and the Immigration and Naturalization Service (IND) itself. She would have created massive legal, practical, and procedural problems. Also, she only focused on refugees and not at all on labor migration. You know how Americans are shouting "The illegals are stealing our jobs!"? And then you blame Democrats for that, while it was the Republicans who created that problem? That's the exact problem in my country: right-wingers LOVE the exploration of labor migrants, and don't want to do anything about it.
When right-wingers privatized childcare, they introduced tax-benefits to keep it a bit affordable. That of course resulted in massive bureaucratic obstacles and red tape, that was needlessly complicated, frustrating, and absurd. When people made a small mistake, they were accused of fraud, and their lives were destroyed. That is the scandal that ensued. Instead of a simple system, paid for by taxes, they wanted to have for profit childcare. It was more expensive for everyone, and created a huge problem, that is now extremely complex and costly to repair.
What is the benefit of childcare, if only the rich can afford it?
You gotto let go of your lazy thinking.
That means that there are no responsible parents. Having kids is selfish.
If humanity were to survive, I would say 1 billion is the max.
However, the system needs fresh people to keep the economy ongoing.
Right-wingers want to keep making profit. That requires kids/workers.
So the wealthy deny climate change and help people breed new livestock.
It's short-term thinking, but what else is new? They'll survive in their bunkers.
They will need some servants and sex-slaves; poor people's kids.
Don't you think that villagers who don't have kids, want someone
to bring them food and wash them, when they are old?
The kids of rich people aren't going to do that.
end up, when they cannot take care of themselves anymore?
Those nursing homes need caregivers. That's not a career often chosen by rich kids.
Taking care of your parents is what poor countries do.
Countries with social benefits have professionals to do that,
keeping the old folks as independent as possible.
Parents don't like to be washed by their children.
Damn, your country is a third-world shit-hole.
How can you kill and claim you're for peace at the same time?
And how is killing compatible with his "christian" faith?
October 8, 2025 ·
Drug cartels from Mexico and Venezuela have killed more Americans than any foreign enemy, yet Democrats are pushing a resolution that would let deadly drugs keep flowing into our country. As Commander in Chief, President Trump is lawfully protecting our homeland and stopping narco-terrorists who threaten our safety. His leadership is saving American lives.
“We won with poorly educated. I love the poorly educated.”
only registered users can see external links
Here it is:
__________
God Bless Tina Peters, who is now, for two years out of nine, sitting in a Colorado Maximum Security Prison, at the age of 73, and sick, for the crime of trying to stop the massive voter fraud that goes on in her State ( where people are leaving in record numbers!),
Hard to wish her a Happy New Year, but to the Scumbag Governor, and the disgusting Republican (RINO!) DA, who did this to her (nothing happens to the Dems and their phony Mail In Ballot System that makes it impossible for a Republican to win an otherwise very winnable State!). I wish them only the worst.
________
Here it is:
__________
God Bless Tina Peters, who is now, for two years out of nine, sitting in a Colorado Maximum Security Prison, at the age of 73, and sick, for the crime of trying to stop the massive voter fraud that goes on in her State ( where people are leaving in record numbers!),
Hard to wish her a Happy New Year, but to the Scumbag Governor, and the disgusting Republican (RINO!) DA, who did this to her (nothing happens to the Dems and their phony Mail In Ballot System that makes it impossible for a Republican to win an otherwise very winnable State!). I wish them only the worst.
________
--------------------------------------- added after 34 hours
Ha
Que tengas salad y prosperidad!
--------------------------------------- added after 15 hours
Error: nuevo
--------------------------------------- added after 15 hours
Error: salud
--------------------------------------- added after 15 hours
Blame that fucking autocorrect.
In October 2002, New York Magazine published a profile of Jeffrey Epstein titled
“Jeffrey Epstein: International Moneyman of Mystery.”
In that article, Trump, then a private businessman, was quoted from a telephone interview about Epstein:
“I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” Trump reportedly said.
“He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it, Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”
How We Know It’s Real? Multiple independent fact-checking outlets confirm this quote was authentic and correctly attributed to Trump in the 2002 New York Magazine interview.
The same quote has been widely cited in subsequent news reporting and analyses of Trump’s past relationship with Epstein.
----------Epstein calling Trump a "horrible human being":----------
"He is a horrible human being"
"He does nasty things to his best friends, his best friends' wives...."
"... anyone who he first tries to gain their trust and then uses it to do bad things."
"That's how it goes."
only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
IMAGINE THAT!!!
One day he loves epstein, so long as he provides going girls to his powerful friends, mountbatten, Cclinton, ..............
And then when it's not convenient why more he can call him names.
No surprises.
"Marjorie Taylor Brown"?
He probably had Epstein killed too.
Epstein was afraid that Trump would kill him.
only registered users can see external links
"Days Before He Died by Suicide, Jeffrey Epstein Gave Specific Reason for Why He Would Never Take His Own Life"
only registered users can see external links
New Comment Go to top