Page #2
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#841
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF,, ANY STUFF III 5.NEW MONGO STUFF, OLD MONGO STUFF, ANY MONGO STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Modern education is a joke.
More like rolling down the hill ass over teacup!
only registered users can see external links
"Meaning: Pleasing to look at, hear, or think about .Example: The mountain scenery was very beautiful .Synonyms: Gorgeous, attractive, lovely, and pretty. Antonyms: Ugly and unattractive."
We're now in the "Good times create weak men" phase of civilization, soon to be followed by the "Weak men create bad times" phase.
only registered users can see external links
Last night I saw a great concert!
Jefferson Starship
Kansas
Deep Purple
Of course I wore my purple Joe Boxers, a purple T-shirt
and a purple plaid shirt.
Jefferson Starship blew the other bands out of the water! They were amazing.
🚫BLACKLIST🚫 don't be a cry 👶 don't like us blacklist, we will magically disappear & all our content, tap following link for details, unlocked for comments.
/forum/thread.php?id=31956#4
only registered users can see external links
-Astronomy professor Samantha Lawler
It would appear that a post from March, 2025, is being resurrected in the NEW STUFF OLD STUFF ANY STUFF THREAD. Either a new post was made by someone who I’ve blacklisted OR someone that I’ve blacklisted has posted something to a post made almost 1.5 YEAR AGO. If that be the case, REALLY and WHY??
The other strange thread that has been revived was opened in 2010, yes, 16 years ago, now has 3 posts and is titled MY GF CUNT. Same scenario as before, a new post made by someone I’ve blacklisted OR someone I’ve blacklisted is responding to a post or poster who has since deleted their profile. I can only guess who I would have blocked who would be interested in a thread about their girlfriend’s cunt. Bwahahahaha!
This original post from Bella was just trumpet blowing as usual, she knows the member is Leo, she knows how the site works.
Story kinda reads like democrats and how they treat Trump
Of course this is television and there are commercial breaks and that’s what I’m going to post about. There’s a Consumer Cellular ad that makes me laugh, they refer to this as the Summer Switch. My take is that Consumer Cellular targets seniors as Consumer Cellular tailors plans beginning at low, low rates which are based on usage. Anyway….. part of the hype of this ad is that they offer U.S. based representatives to make this switch fast and easy! Yeah, they offer U.S. based reps initially to get everything set up however once you’re an established customer and experience a problem with your cellular plan or service, you’re connected to a representative based in who knows where and speaks English that you’re unable to understand!
I tend to make purchases online and have been deceived with the use of AI. I bought a couple of tote bags and an expensive hamper that were represented as being quilted. Pffft! The only thing quilted about these products was the sellers attempt to make the print on the canvas look like stitching!
/c42ig33sqp4lpic.html
Apparently "Pop" is a war veteran that lost his left leg because of roadside bomb?
Couldn't leave a comment on the page.,
Australian, idiot, bogan door dasher.
it can be. I asked ChatGPT to turn a drawing photorealistic. This was a drawing by Dutch painter, artist and graphic artist Anton Pieck (19 April 1895 – 24 November 1987).
There are several mistakes in it, but it still is pretty awesome.
• in the original, there’s a woman wearing a bonnet with a couple of long, flowing red boobs. In the AI enhanced photo, that same woman appears to have a lush head of hair that cascades over her shoulder.
• in the original, toward the left, there’s a gentleman without a hat, that looks totally out of place as well as another gentleman to his right, the hat does not look like the original and does not appear to be proper for that period.
• the French horn (I think) is bigger in AI vs original.
--------------------------------------- added after 6 hours
Gee, I didn’t catch that….. it’s been about 18 months since I’ve had this DAMN iPhone and it’s still making me cuss!!!! In my original post the first bullet reads as follows;
• in the original, there’s a woman wearing a bonnet with a couple of long, flowing red boobs (should read RIBBONS). In the AI enhanced photo, that same woman appears to have a lush head of hair that cascades over her shoulderI
And the guy on the bottom right is now wearing a cap mixed with a top hat.
I have a growing collection of drawings and images that AI made realistic.
I recently found out that Copilot at work can do it too, and there's no limit to that,
other than what my boss wouldn't consider an incredible waste of time and resources.
And hey, if you're bored & looking for something to do
Sadly today, Dolly Parton has passed away at the age of 80 years old. Details of the exact cause of death have not been released.
Putin should listen to this song as I feel like the russia ukraine war is about the same as our American civil war. just trying to keep em all under flag.
There is a whole album of similar songs, all talking about different aspects of the civil war. I was talking to a friend that does reenactments of battles, alot of stuff about that war that gets ignored. Can you imagine what it would be like to be fighting at Gettysburg? 90,000 horses in that 1 battle combined from both sides.
I had often wondered how battlefields were cleaned up of dead bodys, if you notice there is not really alot of graves for either side.Thats because famers would turn their hogs out at night to eat the bodys. if you were gut shot, you were left lay because the dr's really couldn't do much for you. the tent where arms and legs were cut off, you never see in photos the pile of parts laying outside a "window" of the tent. Those to ,were ate by wild boars or local pigs from a farm.
All that because Lincoln wanted us under 1 flag and used slavery as a excuse. and we are supposed to forget? yea right.
You don't think that the North was justified to force the South back into the union,
so why are you arguing that Russia is justified to force Ukraine back into the union?
The American Civil War was fundamentally a conflict over whether the Southern states could leave the United States and form their own country. The Union fought to preserve the United States as a single state, while the Confederacy fought for independence. The Southern states did attempt to find a political solution before the war: there were several proposed compromises, most notably the Crittenden Compromise of December 1860, which sought to resolve the dispute over slavery and prevent secession. These efforts failed, and Confederate forces attacked Fort Sumter on April 12, 1861. Slavery was central to the secession crisis, so the Civil War was not simply a war about “keeping everyone under one flag.” The key point is that the Confederate states were already legally part
of the United States and were attempting to secede from an existing political union.
Ukraine declared independence from the Soviet Union on August 24, 1991, and its independence was confirmed by referendum on December 1, 1991. Russia recognized Ukraine as a sovereign and independent state, and the two countries subsequently entered agreements explicitly recognizing each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity, including the 1997 Russia–Ukraine Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership. This creates an important distinction from the American Civil War: Ukraine was not a state attempting to secede from a country that Russia still legally regarded as its own; Russia had formally recognized Ukraine as an independent country. Therefore, although both conflicts can broadly be described as involving a powerful state fighting over territorial unity, their legal, political, and historical circumstances are fundamentally different.
oh, here is the mess indirectly about cotton that helped the south decide to leave the union.
Protectionist Import Taxes: The federal government taxed manufactured goods coming from Europe to protect industrial interests in the North.Impact on Southern Planters: White Southern planters who sold raw cotton to Great Britain had to buy higher-priced Northern manufactured goods instead of cheaper British alternatives.Reduced Purchasing Power: Southerners argued that taxing British imports indirectly reduced Great Britain's ability or incentive to buy Southern cotton, lowering their overall export earnings.The Nullification Crisis: This ongoing friction over federal tariff policy led South Carolina to attempt to nullify the federal tariff laws, laying the groundwork for decades of sectional hostility prior to the Civil War
raw cotton, so they maintained the dependency on the North.
I see the same unwillingness to solve problems with renewable energy. It costs money and effort to transition away from oil that is causing lots of pollution and expensive energy, constraining progress, so because of some wealthy short-term thinking idiots, the problem isn't solved, by investing in opportunities that grow the whole economy
in the long run.
It turned to NaziAI, when Elon Musk was meddling too much, now it is FoxAI.
Ask yourself how Elon Musk got MAGA to like electric cars and space shit.
He bough Twitter as an investment to get MAGA to do his bidding,
by selling them the nonsense that they want to hear.
Cat, I could bring alot to the table, but folks are so dead set on hate i choose my battles.
Grok leans towards twisting the truth for political reasons.
You prefer that twist of reality, because reality hurts your feelings.
If I ask ChatGPT the question "Do you think that Grok has a political bias now?", it answered:
"Yes — I think it’s fair to say Grok can exhibit a political bias, although I’d distinguish between observable output bias, the preferences built into its system/training, and whether it consistently favors one ideology.
The strongest evidence, in my view, is that Grok's political behavior has changed in response to deliberate tuning, rather than simply reflecting some fixed, accidental bias.
• xAI itself acknowledges political bias as something it evaluates, including differences in framing, sentiment, hedging, and moral language between opposing political questions.
• A large 2025 analysis by The New York Times found Grok's answers shifted noticeably after changes to its instructions, at times moving rightward—especially on government and economic questions—while other topics behaved differently.
• More recent research is mixed: one 2026 benchmark found Grok the only one of eight tested models leaning right, while other tests have placed it closer to center or even slightly left depending on the questions and methodology."
If I ask the same about Venice AI, the answer is:
"Venice AI is a somewhat different case from Grok: I’d be cautious about calling it simply “left” or “right,” because its core pitch is privacy, user control, and fewer model-level restrictions—which can itself create a distinctive political feel.
My take: Venice AI probably has less uniform platform-level political bias than a heavily aligned assistant, but it is definitely not politically neutral.
The key distinction is that Venice is a platform with multiple models, not one single worldview. Venice says it does not add restrictions beyond those inherent in the base models, while also explicitly acknowledging that no model is truly unbiased.
What makes Venice interesting is its own philosophy. Its published system-prompt guidance has included directions such as treating free speech as a virtue and avoiding political correctness. That can make its answers feel more libertarian, anti-establishment, or culturally right-leaning, even when the underlying model isn't consistently right-wing."
I checked Venice AI myself with "Do you think that Trump now portrays a fascist ideology?". The answer was reasonable objective, although a bit naive. It came up with several 'Counterarguments and distinctions', but when I asked it to search for those, it concluded that its own points were 'shaky'. It also didn't find all the best examples against its own arguments, but it agreed with mine when I provided them and added the argumentation for why it fits. It appears be easier to push over Venice AI, than ChatGPT. ChatGPT is a bit more confident in its opinions.
I did like the way it talks to itself. I asked it for its specialty and the first thing it replied was "Creative & Visual" and it was very proud to say that it's 'Uncensored' and 'Private'.
It's definitely not the fastest AI that I ever used.
New Comment Go to top