The ship that never sank?
This guy really rips into the whole Titanic thing and some of what he says makes alot of sense.
only registered users can see external links
For example, where were the icebergs last week?100 years ago,it was a icey mess?
Iceburgs don't go down as far as the wrecks location?
only registered users can see external links
Yea I was just reading about Putins plane disappearing from radar.
When you piss off a bunch like the wagner group,you have fucked up royally.
Yes, Phart, there are differences and most of us know it. Sen. Cruz may not.
One recent Gallup poll showed that 69% of all Americans and a plurality of Democrats believe that athletes should only be allowed to compete against peers who share their biological sex, while just 26% support athletes’ right to compete against peers who share their gender identity.
Happy? How many times are we going to address this despicable affront to humanity? You want my OPINION? College and high school sports should be banned. Those are learning institutions and should be schools to learn the arts and sciences and nothing else. All professional sports should be gender neutral.
Good idea.
I know bike racing while in college recently put a relative in the hospital with a bunch of stitches. Puddle pirate wiped out 6 competitors in a sharp turn.
Well this is supposed to be our last day on earth. According to Thunberg anyway. 5 years ago today she tweeted like a bird about the end of humanity in 5 years. She deleted the tweet recently. Hum. Didn't want to be reminded of her mistake?
She was just a parrot anyway. only registered users can see external links
She was wrong about the date. Do you, Phart, disbelieve we are killing ourselves as a species? 70 million people, + or - , believed Trump would win the 2020 election. They were wrong too. Wasn’t he one of the ones that put her down and telling everyone there’s no climate warming? Hmmmm…….
I did pretty good, I answered 73 of 75 questions accurately and that gave me a score of 96%. I know music!
The two that I answered incorrectly was one where they suggested that you concentrate on what looked like an industrial metal brush combing something and a question at the very end that asked you to identify the pictured vintage device that had a roller, etc.
So today I watched a show about sword 🗡️ making in Japan in America we use propane fired forges in Japan they still use coal and they have over 100 active volcanoes 🌋 polluting the air they also build nuclear plants along the ocean were tsunami's and tidal waves can destroy them releasing radiation into the ocean the land and the air so my question is for cat and of course joe the HO Biden why do you two care about what happens to the earth when no one else does I mean after I’m dead what do I care
even cat realizes we can't save humanity,she is worried about the earth.IF we or our descendants are not here,what difference does it make? A little "hillary" fitted in there.
For what it is worth, MY GUESS is that CAT has responded to your last sentence, "A little "hillary" fitted in there." Since I'm not as smart as either of you, perhaps you could dumb it down for me and explain what your statement meant.
I meant what difference does it make if the earth survives if humans are not on it.
i was just jurking her chain by quoting hillary during the Bengasi investigation.
Trump to speak this evening.
only registered users can see external links
Now tell me something.Regardless if you love or Hat3 him,why is it we can hear anything and everything about everyone else,BUT him on regular tv?
Why must I SEARCH to hear what our President wants to say to us, and the rest is thrown up in my face?
Censorship, should be illegal in our media .
Well I think he did a great job of explaining exactly how things worked. As President, he had the authority to declassify. vice president-senator biden DID NOT.Unless obama comes along and says that HE declassified them,then perhaps that would fix bidens issue.
BUT secret service does not protect bidens corvette.Marlargo is protected by secret service. So those papers if they were important,were safe.
Did Biden fit in 26 boxes of documents into his Corvette?
Having classified documents is only a tiny part of the indictments,
the other indictments are about lying about it and obstructing justice.
Biden didn't do that, he gave the documents back, as soon as he found them.
Trump is also suspected of showing highly classified documents to people who should not have seen them and even selling those documents to the Saudis.
Declassifying documents leaves a paper trail. Presidents cannot declassify documents by just thinking of it. But, if Trump can do that, Obama could too. So then your own logic eliminates any issues you have with Biden. Still, Trump obstructed the national archive's requests several times. That's a violation, whether presidents can mentally declassify documents or not.
Also, when Trump was president, the argument was that you cannot indict a sitting president. They didn't! Biden is president now, Trump isn't. That means there is all
the reason to indict Trump, for all the crimes he did during his presidency, before,
and after, and you have to wait till after Biden's presidency, to indict him.
It's possible, if Republicans can't come up with someone better than Trump
and Democrats can't come up with someone better than Biden.
If Democrats don't want to go with a progressive, at least go with someone younger.
It looks a lot like Gavin Newsom is warming up to run for the primaries.
He could crush DeSantis in a debate, Biden couldn't.
Phart, Thanks to YouTube TV, we can live stream Miami tv channels up here. They had all day coverage of Trump yesterday. Maybe, in your area, the have The Farm News Channel?
Phart, if you have an internet provider, you can purchase a Roku streaming stick for around $30. That has many free channels with movies, tv shows, and news. That's what we use up here and at home. We cut cable and Satellite
Yes,I have 1, caught it on sale for 20 bucks,but newsmax is no on there and the youtube channel never would show the live coverage on it,couldn't get it to show up on a search. strange.
it's legal.They make a killing off of A BUNCH of advertising to. I use it sometimes to watch old tv shows or old movies.none of the new stuff appeals to me and i don't watch much tv to start with.I get my news from the computer. I would much rather be doing something productive with my time,like yard work or hobbies ,I can't get into that burning out in front of the tube.
There would probably be legal channels to watch in The Netherlands too. I can buy them legally from any legitimate internet store. From the box, they don't offer much more than what a smart TV offers. That's why most people who buy such devices, use them to watch channels illegally. I don't really care if you do that, but be cautious if you do. In the past, you could get away with that much easier.
Not everyone who does it gets caught, but they do go after the easy targets
(the ones without a VPN) and make an example out of them.
I don't use a VPN, because I don't watch illegal content. But, I used to download a lot from newsgroups. I stopped doing that and I canceled my subscription for it, because the crackdown is getting scary.
what would illegal content consist of? Why would it be illegal? I mean, I know there are some things that are common sense but I know the british ,somehow they let themselves get conned into having to pay for tv thru the air! no wires no nothing. a tv antenna makes you a suspect.
Any channel that you would normally pay for, directly or by watching ads,
but wouldn't pay for by using a Roku or any other kind of streaming media box,
that's illegal content.
"While it is legal to use services such as Netflix using Roku, as long as you pay for it, some cyber criminals are using the boxes to watch content illegally. Indeed, some users are taking advantage of Roku's “private channel functionality” to access sports and films without paying for them which is illegal."
"Is free streaming illegal in UK?
Although streaming movies via the internet doesn't directly break any laws in the UK, it does go against international copyright laws. Still, it should be noted that no one has ever been prosecuted in the UK for watching free movies online."
"it does go against international copyright laws", so probably also not completely legal in the US.
Ananas, I'm not familiar how Roku works in your country, but, in the US, Roku allows you to stream either FREE channels or those that require a fee IF YOU PAY FOR IT. ROKU will not allow you to access the channel unless you establish an account in these PAY FOR channels AND the channel acknowledges the payment on the Roku app.
“some users are taking advantage of Roku's “private channel functionality” to access sports and films without paying for them which is illegal."
This doesn’t make sense as the viewer is not responsible for the content. Only Roku is responsible if this is true.
We pay for a few. Netflix, Prime, YouTubeTV, Brit Box, YouTube premium, Hulu, and one or two more. Roku won't let you stream without membership to these channels. There's also, literally, hundreds of free channels to stream. We have VPN too.
bella!, my love, I think you should tell everyone you are my wife. I love you, darling
I am not nor have I ever been the member known as CAT, ANGEL1227, Twowarmtts, Twowarmtts2, TWOWARMTTS3 or any of the other assorted names. I have maintained only one profile for over 11 years and that is under the screen name of bella!.
Well, this is a new one. You put poor Bella down yet you come to her thread to talk trash? You two, Sir-Skittles and Pitbull, the two biggest piles of sh.t on this site, ran out of an audience in FREDDY’S old crap thread? This is not my thread so I can’t chase you out of here, but, have a little decency and spare the rest of the good people here your badmouthing.
This guy really rips into the whole Titanic thing and some of what he says makes alot of sense.
only registered users can see external links
For example, where were the icebergs last week?100 years ago,it was a icey mess?
Iceburgs don't go down as far as the wrecks location?
Sad,
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Yea I was just reading about Putins plane disappearing from radar.
When you piss off a bunch like the wagner group,you have fucked up royally.
only registered users can see external links
One recent Gallup poll showed that 69% of all Americans and a plurality of Democrats believe that athletes should only be allowed to compete against peers who share their biological sex, while just 26% support athletes’ right to compete against peers who share their gender identity.
Happy? How many times are we going to address this despicable affront to humanity? You want my OPINION? College and high school sports should be banned. Those are learning institutions and should be schools to learn the arts and sciences and nothing else. All professional sports should be gender neutral.
I know bike racing while in college recently put a relative in the hospital with a bunch of stitches. Puddle pirate wiped out 6 competitors in a sharp turn.
only registered users can see external links
She was just a parrot anyway. only registered users can see external links
As for the human role, a few volcanoes will wipe out anything we do to fix it.
I did 87%. I missed the music groups id's.
The two that I answered incorrectly was one where they suggested that you concentrate on what looked like an industrial metal brush combing something and a question at the very end that asked you to identify the pictured vintage device that had a roller, etc.
i was just jurking her chain by quoting hillary during the Bengasi investigation.
only registered users can see external links
Now tell me something.Regardless if you love or Hat3 him,why is it we can hear anything and everything about everyone else,BUT him on regular tv?
Why must I SEARCH to hear what our President wants to say to us, and the rest is thrown up in my face?
Censorship, should be illegal in our media .
BUT secret service does not protect bidens corvette.Marlargo is protected by secret service. So those papers if they were important,were safe.
Having classified documents is only a tiny part of the indictments,
the other indictments are about lying about it and obstructing justice.
Biden didn't do that, he gave the documents back, as soon as he found them.
Trump is also suspected of showing highly classified documents to people who should not have seen them and even selling those documents to the Saudis.
Declassifying documents leaves a paper trail. Presidents cannot declassify documents by just thinking of it. But, if Trump can do that, Obama could too. So then your own logic eliminates any issues you have with Biden. Still, Trump obstructed the national archive's requests several times. That's a violation, whether presidents can mentally declassify documents or not.
Also, when Trump was president, the argument was that you cannot indict a sitting president. They didn't! Biden is president now, Trump isn't. That means there is all
the reason to indict Trump, for all the crimes he did during his presidency, before,
and after, and you have to wait till after Biden's presidency, to indict him.
and Democrats can't come up with someone better than Biden.
If Democrats don't want to go with a progressive, at least go with someone younger.
It looks a lot like Gavin Newsom is warming up to run for the primaries.
He could crush DeSantis in a debate, Biden couldn't.
or they can crack down hard on you.
Not everyone who does it gets caught, but they do go after the easy targets
(the ones without a VPN) and make an example out of them.
I don't use a VPN, because I don't watch illegal content. But, I used to download a lot from newsgroups. I stopped doing that and I canceled my subscription for it, because the crackdown is getting scary.
but wouldn't pay for by using a Roku or any other kind of streaming media box,
that's illegal content.
"While it is legal to use services such as Netflix using Roku, as long as you pay for it, some cyber criminals are using the boxes to watch content illegally. Indeed, some users are taking advantage of Roku's “private channel functionality” to access sports and films without paying for them which is illegal."
"Is free streaming illegal in UK?
Although streaming movies via the internet doesn't directly break any laws in the UK, it does go against international copyright laws. Still, it should be noted that no one has ever been prosecuted in the UK for watching free movies online."
"it does go against international copyright laws", so probably also not completely legal in the US.
“some users are taking advantage of Roku's “private channel functionality” to access sports and films without paying for them which is illegal."
This doesn’t make sense as the viewer is not responsible for the content. Only Roku is responsible if this is true.
I am not nor have I ever been the member known as CAT, ANGEL1227, Twowarmtts, Twowarmtts2, TWOWARMTTS3 or any of the other assorted names. I have maintained only one profile for over 11 years and that is under the screen name of bella!.
/forum/thread.php?id=31047
New Comment Go to top