Page #35
Pages: #1... #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 ...#60
New Comment Rating: -4 Similar topics: 1.TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME 2.No Collusion. 3.TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME analysis. 4.democrats and associated press close believeallwomen twitter account after Biden sexual assault case came to light 5.Ok,here is a thread for discusson regarding Biden Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
When he is going to be taken home and put on the damn porch with a lemonade and his dog?
only registered users can see external links
Or here: only registered users can see external links
Some of you are waiting to be old enough to get Medicare, so you can finally get
the medication you need. Well, maybe not! The health insurance companies want in.
They hate that old people get tax-funded medication, without them making money from it. They will stand in between your tax dollars and your medication, considering whether you deserve it. They will both restrict a lot of people getting their medication and increase the cost of the system. It might also be the first step, to make Medicare suck just as much as the rest of your healthcare system. Don't count on any Republicans voting against this, because they are bribed by the health insurance companies too.
Did any of your right-wing news outlets warn you about this? I would be surprised.
only registered users can see external links
Ha. I thought everyone knew that. To be elected by assholes has to be a bittersweet victory.
he has made a profession of scamming people. Who would you choose as your
target group, if you are a snake oil salesman.
Besides, he's not smart enough himself to scam smart people.
Was Donald Trump’s IQ Measured at 73?
only registered users can see external links
But all those things Trump did, comes down to breaking shit without rebuilding them, giving massive tax breaks to the rich and increasing the debt with 36% to $27 trillion, with lasting effects of the deficit.
DEBT CREATES INFLATION! So you blame Biden for what Trump caused.
"President Biden’s Economic Strategy and Fiscal Responsibility Decreasing Deficit
by More Than $1.3 Trillion — Largest One-Year Decline in U.S. History"
If there is anything right-wingers say to care about, it's the debt and the deficit.
only registered users can see external links
Because Trump is so tough on Russia, off course!
No one picks a 'leader' as enemy, you pick the weakest one. Or a friend.
If Biden was so weak, Russia would support him, like they did Trump.
CNN Exclusive: 'We control them all': Donald Trump Jr. texted Meadows ideas for overturning 2020 election before it was called:
only registered users can see external links
His texts are clear evidence of treason.
But Democrats could still be cucks enough to let it slide.
He said: "I don't know. I probably put in 3, 4, 5, maybe $800,000 of my own money to her legal defense fund."
That's a crime, state law prohibits gifts of more than $65.
Lindell also admitted that he flew her out to his cyber symposium last year on his own private plane. That is also considered a gift, that would be valued at over $65.
So Mike Lindell has got some problems.
A donation can (according to the law, but there are loopholes) only be used for campaign purposes and therefore doesn't directly benefit the recipient.
His puppeteer and tutor is in the white house and he is ignored.
only registered users can see external links
You musta got ahold of some REALLY GOOD SHIT today!
Good job
But I must also admit,I can't help but laugh when I see that picture of biden just blank face,looks lost.Like he is thinking, "where am i, this don't look like my basement".
It is really sad that the man in position of President is in a shape that prompts jokes. We should have a strong man in that job that when he is standing there,he is the subject of attention and resspect. Not the man from 7 years ago.
only registered users can see external links
Now she has found it, she's doing what all ex-liberals do, say what right-wingers like to hear; which is culture war bullshit. In another year or so she's just as right wing as Ann Coulter and Laura Ingraham, with the intention of getting a job like them. She's pretty, she can talk and if she doesn't mind wearing a very short skirt, she has a good chance.
It doesn't make her less of a grifter, in other words: 'prostitute'. Although I respect women who provide sexual services much more.
Dem Strategist says: 'We're Gonna Get Slaughtered In November!'.
Here's a lefty who said so all along. He explains how Democrats can still win.
(Not by listening to Dem Strategists and not by being Republican light)
only registered users can see external links
I will say,right wingers are usually extreme in the other direction. You need to operate somewhere around the 85 % right,not 100%
"do as we say do,not as we do".
only registered users can see external links
you don't and can't. And all powerful, rich people got vaccinated, first in line.
--------------------------------------- added after 4 minutes
Yea though I walk through the valley of the shadows of death 💀 I shall fear no evil for when the shit hits the fan I shall become the baddest man on the planet
The first rule of nature is; adapt or go extinct.
Let free enterprise bring about the change as the PEOPLE want it,not government mandated.
The drama about taxes is getting so old. Those taxes would pay for things you now pay MORE for by yourself. Unless you can't afford it, than you don't have the healthcare that you need (or education or housing or roads and bridges (toll) or retirement if you let them take it too).
Conservatives wouldn't have changed a bit from the 1950's by themselves, because they have no ideas whatsoever. Free enterprise is literally the only idea in decades. The rest is just fighting back what liberals and progressives fought tooth and nail for.
If it wasn't for liberals, we would all be serfs working for our lord-king.
More and more people are waking up to the fact that free enterprise is only serving it's own needs. It changes our lives only as far as it makes money for the owners.
If there's money in poisoning, starving, ruining or killing people, that's just how it is. Free enterprise is selfish and short-sighted. It causes all the big financial crises and asks the tax-payer to solve it.
You are the one crying about inflation and high gas prices, which free enterprise is completely responsible for and then you point to a president to solve it, while corrupt politicians bowing to free enterprise have taken all his control away to change anything about its causes. Because that would be socialism.
If you want 'survival of the fittest' between people and free enterprise,
YOU are not among the ones surviving!
The liberals want to take what people have worked for away from them and distribute it "evenly" amoung the lazy and non working.That is why we dig our heels in.
And until people start making a effort to get the things they need and want,they should be at the back of the line.
What if all the working class conservatives walked off their jobs today because they were tired of being robbed by the tax man.And they all just walked away from their debts and went to uncle joe for a check? What if Elon and others were to just say fuck it,we have done enough, and took their money to antartica?
Then where oh where would the liberals get the tax dollars to give out to the 1's that don't do anything?????
But your healthcare system isn't helping you much.
There you go fighting straw-men again. Even the most socialist countries don't distribute 'evenly' among the lazy and non-working. They just provide the basics to as many people as possible and make working actually rewarding. You know the working class doesn't have the luxury to stop working anywhere in the world.
Even Finland and Denmark will put pressure on people to work, unless they aren't capable of it. But they do make it easy to make a living on much less hours per week, have lots of time off, give parents maternity and paternity leave, give public healthcare services, they ranked #1 in the Educating for the future index and still the Global Innovation Index ranks them number one for the fourth year in a row when it comes to business environment and still their taxes are not preventing them to have the first to third highest quality of life score (depending on the year),
while the US is 20th.
All those rich guys are expendable. The next one will immediately fill in the gap as soon as competition allows. And most do more harm than good. Elon only just passes the bar, because he made electric cars cool. He still hasn't made them affordable, because he likes being wealthy more than being a force for good. Most only care about their wealth and are mostly doing damage. We don't need filthy rich people for jobs, especially not the jobs that improve the world.
Maybe conservatives would go home if they weren't forced to work, it doesn't happen in progressive countries, because most work doesn't suck as much here. We also have a much lower unemployment.
None of your straw-man only come close to reality.
--------------------------------------- added after 57 seconds
And don’t forget. The rest of the planet thinks Democrat.
and the fool shall be servant to the wise in heart.
The toughest is not always the winner.
only registered users can see external links
The real reason: Biden doesn't deliver on his promises.
Let’s first define the playing field. What promises are we talking about? Second, what is the time frame?
only registered users can see external links
His biggest failures are off course Build Back Better and the voting rights bills.
I would say those are vital for the mid term elections. Especially voting rights,
because it prevents the Republicans to stack the odds in their favor even further.
The reason for the failures and why he is responsible for them is that he is not forcing 'moderate' Democrats to fall in line.
Progressives had a deal with the other Democrats, that BBB would be passed together with the infrastructure bill. They didn't pass, until finally the Democrats disconnected those bills. But Biden promised that Manchin and Sinema would vote for it. Progressives knew he would not upheld that promise, but they folded to the pressure of Nancy Pelosi, Biden and all of the media. And surprise, no BBB gets passed.
Now, you might not agree with all of the policies that Biden promised or that the progressives want, but I believe you want the Democrats to win elections. I can tell you now that they will need a miracle to win the mid term elections and they have no chance of winning in 2024, with anyone lining up at the moment. So why would that be the fault of the left? If people are content with what the got so far and not getting BBB or voting right, or basically anything else, than why are Biden's approval ratings so horrendous?
FDR never had that problem. He had majorities up to 80%, because he DELIVERED for people. They had to introduce term limits to get him out, or he would have been president till he died.
With incumbent you mean Biden? You really can't think he will be able to win or even run again, don't you? He would be 82. I'm not ageist, but a president shouldn't be that old. Biden should have already started with lining up a successor. And if he doesn't, the progressives should find a hardliner to challenge him. How do you expect your party to win by getting weaker and weaker candidates, while the Republicans are getting stronger with their purpose every time?
only registered users can see external links
Well, people can believe anything, but I hope you understand that the chance
is not great. Can't you think of someone with a stronger chance?
How about someone with charisma, courage, perseverance, shelf life and clarity?
There are Democratic politicians who have those characteristics.
Why are they not pushed forward by the Democratic Party?
I hope you understand that the Republicans are not playing anymore.
They have decided that democracy doesn't work for them anymore and they
can't put back women, colored people, gays and workers back in 'their place', without destroying democracy and put in a dictator who will be untouchable
from then on. Maybe they will still allow you to vote, like Putin and Erdoğan do,
but they will laugh about your votes.
After your democracy (what's left of it), they will destroy your rule of law
(what's left of it), your freedom of the press (what's left of it), your freedom
of speech (what's left of it) and every other right you have as an individual.
So, why gamble on someone who will be 82 in 2024, 86 at the end of his term and already was showing signs of mental decline in 2020? Why gamble on someone who has been dropping in popularity consistently and doesn't show the leadership to unite his party and implement policies that have massive support under Democrats and even majority support under the whole American population?
If you put up Biden again, you deserve to lose and suffer the consequences.
True,but they can't be controlled like biden
The Democratic establishment prefers losing over angering their donors.
It is a tough position the put themselves in; telling people they work for them
and simultaneously taking money from people that don't want them to.
Republicans don't have that problem, their voters and donors want the same;
fucking over the people for corporate greed.
Maybe they will again vote for the Democrat, even if it's a cheese sandwich,
if the Republican is crazy enough, but would you gamble on that?
Why not give people a good candidate?
And then I hope a strong charismatic populist wins.
Because, it's tough to say this, but Republican voters are better at ignoring the lying media, telling them to pick a weak candidate. They still pick the worst candidate, but for them it's the strongest candidate, with the highest chance to win. And then they support their candidate through thick and thin.
Let me put it kindly, Democrats don't do that. At least not since Obama.
Your only way to win with the Democrats, is to pick a fighter.
All the reasons you ever gave for voting for Biden were propagated by
the media. The called Bernie Sanders an extremist, lied about his policy proposals and called it irresponsible to vote for him. They lifted up Biden,
didn't talk about his mental decline (which is now the primary target of Republicans) and called him the 'safe' candidate.
Even if you are not as left wing as Sanders, he was still your best choice.
He would have fought day and night to improve people's livelihoods,
even though the 'centrists' would have fought him tooth and nail.
He would have achieved many popular things and won the mid terms.
Even if Biden wins the mid terms, he will not do much more of what he promised. Some Democratic voters will then still vote for Biden again,
but I would be surprised if it was enough. Even though the Democrats are better, people demand more from them. That's not fair, but that's politics.
Republicans have it easy, their voters like getting screwed for the donors. They prefer stupid culture war shit, that doesn't cost anything. It does a lot of damage, but Republicans blame that on the Democrats. Great strategy, money and power for them and useful horrific consequences later.
Than you were correct. Too bad so many others were wrong.
(completely my opinion off course, but backed by arguments)
I would have voted for Biden in the general too, unless I was sure
my state would go to Biden anyway. He was still better than Trump.
The only one I wouldn't have voted for was Bloomberg.
--------------------------------------- added after 13 minutes
Better yet send him to Siberia
The FBI would not EVER have listened to the CLOWN.
So you think I’m a Commie and sent to FUCK MEX MEN?
--------------------------------------- added after 9 minutes
I sleep with a Puerto Rican and an Irish men so I have no room to talk
Spoken like someone who obviously cares about democracy.
The man is a mild mannered social democrat, who has been working his whole life to give people rights, a living wage, education and healthcare, while fighting against corruption.
If that is communism, than communism is fantastic.
I cannot understand the enormous fear and anger directed at him.
- Washed up? Sure he's the poorest senator, because he doesn't take corporate money, like all your corrupt 'representatives' do, but he still has a nice salary and a net worth of $3 million dollars, mostly because of a bestselling book. He is the longest serving independent member of Congress in American history. And he did it for the people, not to enrich himself, which is very rare in US politics.
- Dottering? He might be repetitive, but he knows his stuff and he knows how to communicate it. His message is supported by statistics and data.
He is consistent and truthful. No Republican has a message as clear as Bernie Sanders, all of them puke out bullshit when they speak. And most Democrats are just emitting hot air. Bernie Sanders is at his age, still sharp as a tack, tells how it is, never gets stuck in his words, is concise and consistent in his message, doesn't use foul language and stands for what he said. You voted for Trump, who can't read, can't finish a sentence, is a broken record and is completely incapable of ever speaking the truth intentionally. Trump can only blabber out the truth by accident, when he is trying to brag or his brain malfunctions again.
You have no business calling Bernie Sanders washed up or dottering.
It only shows your biases in your thinking.
--------------------------------------- added after 13 hours
And then later that night Sasquatch came down out of the woods and I shared a box of delicious slim Jim’s with him
But, restricting mail voting could come back to bite Republicans,
because older people lean Republican more and like mail voting more.
Maybe standing in line the whole day isn't enough of a challenge between people and their RIGHT to vote. Put a military obstacle course before every
polling station.
Or just cut all the foul play and just let everyone vote.
Republicans don't do that, because they know they can't win then.
People fought and died for your right to vote and you are to lazy to stand in line for a while? Geez.
Mail in ballots are a good way to cheat,and a good way to loose your vote.Or have you not followed our news reports of mail and packages being stolen and discarded over into ditches and along rail road tracks?
When you go vote, you slide the ballot in the machine,you can see the numbers jump 1 and YOU KNOW your vote at least made it to the computer.Unlike our mail service,you mail may not make it out of the town limits.
"Oh that sumbitch is conservative, burn that ballot" says the crooked mail man.
Long lines are used to benefit the party in power. If the Republicans are in power they close polling places in neighborhoods where more Democrats live. Democrats might do the same when they are in Power. That's the reason you don't want long lines. Lines more than an hour are nonsense. If you think that's OK, you're just condoning your authorities to do a bad job or you like that is used to influence voting.
Mail in ballots are just as secure as in person voting. It's true that it favored the Democrats, but they did it lawfully and democratically.
Creating distrust in the elections was a strategy of Trump. He was also trying to destroy the mail service. Those things were clear to see. That's not a crime, but it's not respecting Democracy. What Trump and Republicans did later, was not only criminal but treason.
If there was cheating by the Democrats, that would have been discovered by now. Democrats are gutless and ineffective. They are not in any way capable of organizing that sort of cheating, without it getting discovered.
Republicans are bold enough to organize all sorts of fraud and they did, but they are also not effective enough to not get caught. Your rule of law should punish them for that, or they will do it again and again, until they destroy democracy.
There are always potential arguments against mail voting, but there is no evidence that it happened or at least happened enough to swing an election.
I advocate for elections being as safe and secure as possible. But, if that restricts peoples ability to vote, the right to vote has priority over any other concerns. If you want to abolish mail voting, there should be a safe method of voting in person, not require people to stand in line for hours and possibly contract a deadly disease. Because that favors the young, the healthy and people who deny the existence of COVID-19 over the old, the vulnerable and people who accept the risk of COVID-19. That can swing the election.
Have you no knowledge of our lousy ass postal service? The big problem right now is peoples checks being stolen and reproduced and on top of that sold on the "dark web".
from the postal service no less.
--------------------------------------- added after 18 minutes
If only you could hear my voice just ask Bella or scorps I have a deep loud commanding voice
What is your lifes blueprint?
STAY IN SCHOOL
Set out to do good a job!
There is no winning in war. Didn't you notice that consistency in all those wars yet?
I'm sure a strong daddy, who protects them, looks appealing to scared little boys.
MEN prefer smart, careful DIPLOMATS.
Yep, you caught hell for that statement.
The questions she is getting from Republicans are ridiculous.
If you can't see that you have brain rot.
Do you always need to be that pathetically partisan?
In any case they only cared about pushing their culture war bullshit again.
Why don't you define a woman they way a judge should be able to?
Or at least the definition you would have accepted.
But she also has to obey the law, when it comes to the right to personal identity.
She could say that, but she probably didn't because what ever she said, Republicans would make a complete spectacle of culture war bullshit from it.
wom·an
/ˈwo͝omən/
Learn to pronounce
noun
noun: woman; plural noun: women
an adult female human being.
No degree needed.We learned this in school back before the liberals started all this spectacle of culture war bullshit.
Would the Republicans have been satisfied with the dictionary definition?
Does your dictionary definition say anything about the LAW?
The law has no definition of a woman. It says people have freedom of identity.
Here's a discussion on this topic between Michael Knowles and David Pakman:
only registered users can see external links
The same kind of folks that have told us for 2 years or more to "follow the science" are the same 1's that can't define the word woman. ANd when she answered that question, she ADMITED that biology was involved because she said she was not a biologist.
You wanted her to say that, but a judge is also for people who progressed beyond that level of simplicity.
I agree her answer was weak. She should have mocked that question to hell.
Ignorant people used them interchangeably incorrectly.
Life is complicated. I know you want everything to be simple, but it isn't and the law isn't either. Those Republicans were only trying to dumb down a serious discussion about human rights, which are in your law, to a stupid definition-of-words-discussion.
People want freedom of identity. And your reaction to that is either "that's dumb" or that "makes me uncomfortable". Sad day for you, it's their FREEDOM.
You know, that concept Republicans always say matters to them.
You know it's not about words.
New Comment Go to top