Page #134
Pages: #1... #129 #130 #131 #132 #133 #134 #135 #136 #137 #138 ...#194|
Started by #610414 [Ignore] 14,May,20 02:51
New Comment Rating: 3 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.STUFF, JUST STUFF 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 4.A Forum Topic 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
Who the fuck is bce88???
Is it Madness, is it Greatness, is it Art or is it Ridicule.
Lend him thy ears and thou shalt be enlightened....
only registered users can see external links
Oh, perhaps I should overlook the fact that you have the tendency to utter things that are hateful and/or untrue just so you can be "seen" and "heard".
WHY DO YOU ALWAYS ASSUME THAT MY POST’s PURPOSE IS TO BE SEEN OR HEARD ANY MORE THAN YOUR POSTINGS? WE POST TO BE HEARD AND SEEN. THAT IS THE PURPOSE FOR A “FORUM”
Is it a badge of honor that someone would say that you are the kind of woman that a man would enjoy fighting? Do those types of feelings toward you bring a smile to your face and make you feel warm and fuzzy?
IT IS NOT A BADGE OF HONOR. IT’S MOSTLY A PAIN IN THE ASS. AS FAR AS BEING MADE TO FEEL WARM AND FUZZY, YOU AND I MUST HAVE DIFFERENT IDEAS AS TO WHAT MAKES A WOMAN WARM AND FUZZY.
And as for the ability to stand up for yourself, I've witnessed that you will stand your ground when it comes to your belief system, I'll give you that but your passion for saying hurtful, nasty, truths or untruths, just for the sake of being heard or having the last word makes me shake my head.
I’M GLAD YOU FINALLY NOTICED I AM NOT SOMEONE’S PUPPET. MY PASSION (FUNNY WAY TO DESCRIBE MY SPEECH HABITS) FOR UTTERING HURTFUL, NASTY, TRUTHS, OR UNTRUTHS IS NOT JUST FOR THE SAKE OF BEING HEARD OR HAVING THE LAST WORD. THIS IS A FORM OF DEBATE AND, I CAN ASSURE YOU, IT’S AS TRUTHFUL AS I AM ABLE TO UNDERSTAND IT. SHAKE YOUR HEAD ALL YOU WANT, IF NOTHING ELSE, IT IS EFFECTIVE.
I recognize that the world is full of people that I may or may not like and as for the people that I may not like, I will do my damndest to avoid and/or to ignore them.
WELL, SEE? WE CAN AGREE ON SOME THINGS. HOWEVER, GETTING BACK TO THIS EXCHANGE OF VIEWS, WOULD YOU PLEASE ENLIGHTEN ME WHY YOU GOT A FART CAUGHT SIDEWAYS? I WAS NOT TRYING TO GET YOUR GOAT (ALTHOUGH ALL I HAVE TO DO SO IS POST IN YOUR THREAD). ALL I WAS TRYING TO SAY IS THAT YOU DO SEEM TO KNOW HOW TO GET SITE INFO MUCH BETTER THAN ME.
PLEASE EXCUSE THE CAPS. I’M NOT SHOUTING. I USE INKPAD TO WRITE RESPONSES TO LONG POSTS BY OTHER MEMBERS. THE CAPS MAKE IT EASIER TO EDIT.
only registered users can see external links
Who the hell do democrats think they are to decide what is true and what is not??
Remember fauchi saying we didn't need mask for over 2 months? Then after the virus got a good hold on the country,we couldn't take a shit without a mask on??????
To deny anyone the right to express ideas, theorys ,facts, fictions, etc,is denying the people of the freedom of the press.
Just like the videos of people ballot harvesting that WERE on Youtube,removing them only denys the poster and the people the right to decide for themselves what they are seeing and hearing.
Or is the catholic faith also right?
He doesn't understand the concept of patriarchs.
He also makes a huge mistake:
The lingua franca of the catholic church is Latin.
But Latin was the language of those (Romans) who
fought against christianity for 3 centuries.
Why use the language of the oppressors
and not the language(s) of those who
accepted the religion right away?
(Greek, Aramaic, Hebrew.)
Answer: politics.
Paying tribute to the emperors.
Nevertheless, if you think about it,
the catholic church was created around 1000 AD, well, give or take.
By that time, the western Roman empire was gone.
It had fallen to Germanic tribes who,
being kind of uncivilized, adopted Latin
to appear more sophisticated.
The eastern Roman empire was well and alive and didn't use Latin at all.
The catholic church was a political creation.
But soon, I'm afraid, we'll see further divisions
within the orthodoxical church.
Hint: Russia/Ukraine.
Already, many pro-Russian Ukrainian priests
are turning their back to Russia.
(Thanks to the Putin. It's funny he considers himself Christian lol).
Yes, I know, many religious leaders have nothing to do with the religion. It's always been the case. Alas, religions are not against those who are against them, not even their leaders.
But nobody speaks about these things. Neither the religious people, nor the non religious ones. So, from the point of view of orthodoxy, as expressed by the thousands of bishops and priests, Putin is a veritable orthodox Christian.
That is "mother person of the city".
And it can never be a woman, I suppose.
Religions have at least two faces:
The one through its beliefs and traditions and dogmas.
The one related to governance and politics.
The two are often incompatible.
E.g. the Anglican church, a spinoff of Catholicism, was established by Henry the whatever number who wanted to fuck different women. Hence the queen of England is the head of that church. How it's possible to be a member of that church not accept its ridiculous governance and its provenance is beyond me. Whatever...
Actually, prohibition of marriage in Catholicism is not part of christianity, its something introduced by a Pope long time ago. Which is probably why catholic priests have so many sexual problems and turn into abuses. Can't change nature mr Pope. Get that!
--------------------------------------- added after 82 seconds
Burn 🔥 them out like the rat’s that they are
that's it!
I had no idea it was THIS BAD
Raising your hand in class is racist? Read this and find yourself shaking your head in disbelief.
only registered users can see external links
"The text even argues that "requiring students to raise their hand before speaking can reinforce paternalism and powerhoarding, in addition to breaking the process of thinking, learning, and communicating.""
So having all the kids screaming questions at the same time is better?? FOR WHO?
"The activists pushing to create anti-racist math classes seem to believe that if minority students underperform in a subject, schools must penalize high achievers (usually white and Asian students) to ensure they aren't at an academic advantage"
SAY WHAT? You are smart,so we penalize you? Back to what I have said before, democrats don't want people to work,or improve themselves.What better way to promote that behavior than to make success a offense?
Or is she gone?
only registered users can see external links
Don't create a debt you can't pay.
And what kind of example is it setting to force taxpayers to soak up the debt?
What debt will left leaners want canceled next? car payments? House payments?
IF you are going to cancel anything, cancel a debt that people incurred by causes beyond their control, MEDICAL DEBT.
only registered users can see external links
He keeps up this good work,he might be tough to beat if he runs for President or runs with Trump.
only registered users can see external links
Students years from now will borrow to go to college and expect their debts to be erased as well. We ALL will pay higher prices for everything.
--------------------------------------- added after 20 minutes
While the area of Disney World is governed and taxed by Disney, it’s only the area they control (the size of a city and containing housing, roads, restaurants and hospitality businesses) . Their magnet for tourism created a boom in business and taxes for several hundred miles around. Florida profited hundred of times more because of Disney. Even Miami and the cruise industry is indebted to Disney. You are wrong.
What would happen to LTT if Linus died?
only registered users can see external links
Best i can tell, he would need to do what my mothers side of the family did with the family farm. Put it in a trust. With all family members names on it.1 person or 2 persons die, nothing changes except those names come off the trust.
He says "I don't know a way to do that, without losing what's special about what we're doing here.". What he says is "Not only does a publicly held company become soleless, because it serves it's shareholders, but it's actually legally obligated to be soleless and put it's shareholders first, before anything else."
He has a vision that has made his company great and has served his employees very well. They have been growing their own capabilities, to a point that they would normally have left, but he keeps them associated with the company, because he allows them a lot of freedom and doesn't take ownership of everything they create. He shares the value.
"If the shareholders disagree, then they can make an argument that I was not acting in their best interest, they can push me out and then the can sit and wallow in their own filth, with no vision now..."
He even sees the exact same problem with an employee ownership plan, which is the closest to socialism possible. His employees wouldn't be able to afford their share, because the estimated worth of his company would have a big multiplier over the current worth, because he grew so fast. And if he gives his employees their share, the taxes would be ridiculously high, because of the same multiplier on the company's worth.
The current economy is just completely fine-tuned for capitalism and stacked against any self-desired socialism. The best thing he can do at the moment is not die.
The nearest solution that may work would be for him to sell that company to a younger person or group so it will be sustainable longer. Then start another company.starting and builing up companys may be the better route for him .
But if the company has shares owned by stock holders,the soul is owned already. no bringing it back.
There is unfortunately no way to run a company with absolute freedom to do as you please, without having complete ownership. But I do think it's good that a company cannot just be inherited by the next of kin, without inheritance taxes. He is exceptional in his progressive ideas and maybe that's lost if he dies, but companies getting passed on from heir to heir, within a bloodline, creates a sort of lordship that is even more damaging to society. Besides, there is no certainty that the next owners would do a worse job of managing the company, than the heirs.
Why would children have the (full) right to ownership inheritance, rather than the employees. Employees actually helped build the company, children are just lucky if their parents own something worth inheriting. Capitalism gives people ownership, that they didn't work a day for in their lives and gives power to people who don't have the qualifications for to use wisely. Socialism could give ownership and power to the people who actually worked in that company.
I imagine your brain already exploding, before you even reached the end.
And who is Linus?
His full name is Linus Sebastian and he is from Canada.
only registered users can see external links
He started with unboxing videos in 2008, by himself and now has a big media company. Here's a video of him doing a tour of his new studio.
only registered users can see external links
New Comment Go to top