Laughably Small Penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!
Get Paid For
Using Social Sites!
Tired of ads
on this site?
Want a bigger penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III

Discussion Forum on Show Your Dick

Page #48

Pages:  #1... #43   #44   #45   #46   #47   #48   #49   #50   #51   #52   ...#195
Started by #610414 [Ignore] 14,May,20 02:51
NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF. POST WHAT YOU LIKE, ASK WHAT YOU LIKE, LEAVE MSGS HERE. PLEASE BE CIVIL. IF YOU ARE GOING TO BITCH, DO IT WITH SOME CLASS. IF YOU LIKE WHAT'S WRITTEN,COMMENT. IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT YOU SEE, COMMENT. ALL I ASK IS PROOF.
New Comment       Rating: 3  


Comments:
By Gntlmn [Ignore] 09,Sep,23 23:38 other posts 
OL diarrhea diaper Donnie's gonna get buttfucked with mop handles
By #610414 10,Sep,23 16:34
Good. I’d pay good money to see that. 🤣🤣😈


By Maxwell_93 [Ignore] 09,Sep,23 20:49 other posts 
This is exactly what they want. To have us arguing amongst ourselves over issues that could be compromised on, but are saved to be used as cudgels during elections. We're gonna run out of road someday unless we can actually get third party candidates on the map. I'm so sick of picking candidates that are the lessor of two evils while we continue to get bent over by taxes and the eroding value of our currency.
By dgraff [Ignore] 09,Sep,23 21:01 other posts 
How true we need a change desperately
By phart [Ignore] 09,Sep,23 21:35 other posts 
sadly the system is setup as such a third party don't have a chance at debates or anything.At this time in our history,the 3rd party vote is a vote for the party you don't like.


By #610414 09,Sep,23 09:10
Article in The Guardian

"Covid-19 deaths are inevitable in Florida, Democrats are warning, after rightwing Republican governor Ron DeSantis joined the state’s controversial surgeon general in urging residents to ignore public health advice and avoid new vaccines targeting a resurgence of the virus."

Two A...HOLES in a pod.


By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 05,Sep,23 15:38 other posts 
HOW can they be SO INCOMPETENT?
only registered users can see external links

A story about Facebook being absolute shite.
By phart [Ignore] 05,Sep,23 19:38 other posts 
I can't say I am surprised .Never been on butt book ,I mean face book. Could probably catch up with long lost class mates and yadda yadda but you know, if they want to find me and talk,there are other ways.

1 things for sure, that dog loves the guy!
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 06,Sep,23 08:41 other posts 
Since Elon fired all those Twitter employees, it's even worse.
Isn't it strange that a site like we're on now can do better?

He's doing every video with that dog on his lap.
Those are really two inseparable friends indeed.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 06,Sep,23 09:11 other posts  ⤴
This is one thing I agree with you 1000%. All these things are shit. How is it possible for Zuckerberg and the likes to become millionaires without doing anything is puzzling to me. Creating industry, like steel, or motors and the like requires tremendous effort and produces useful things. Writing code for Facebook requires a weirdo mind and results in products that aren't useful.
By phart [Ignore] 06,Sep,23 10:05 other posts 
Being I was in college learning how to write programs for computers in Basic, I can say, it is head scratching to get 1 symbol or something out of order and then try to go back and find it. yea, a weirdo mind might love it, I hated it.
Alot of the issue's in my opinion, with this type of tech is they try to make it so complicated, this site is simple to use not much extra's to give trouble.no changes have been made in a while,no need for them.
Tech in some area's needs to plateau,such as facebook. Constant change makes for issues and vulnerability's.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 06,Sep,23 11:40 other posts 
They make it complicated for one reason, can you guess what it is? I know because I work with people who are doing this kind of programming abs some are pretty high up in these businesses.
By phart [Ignore] 06,Sep,23 22:21 other posts 
to limit control of machines and etc to a few that understand the "code".
By leopoldij [Ignore] 07,Sep,23 00:03 other posts 
Well, it's mostly so that they can keep you (and me) hooked on the screen for long time, as long as possible. Because they make money when we're on for long time. (It's more likely to watch a fucking ad.)
By phart [Ignore] 07,Sep,23 11:59 other posts 
Makes sense,
By leopoldij [Ignore] 07,Sep,23 16:49 other posts 
That's what capitalism is now: people making money out of nothing. It has long been predicted that capitalism will end up being a beast on its own. And this is what we're witnessing. The solution is to put a cap on how much money can make, as an individual, from useless work, like facebook. 200 billion dollars profit is unacceptable. This is were a good democratic government should intervene.
By phart [Ignore] 07,Sep,23 17:03 other posts 
And just who is this God like figure going to be who decides, How much is to much? And what is to stop them from moving the goal post to a point 600 dollars is to much?
That's exactly it; they are not interested in making something good, with good service. It started as a hobby, then they realized there was money in it.
So they went for the money, but never invested in making it better than is needed to serve the money purpose.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 07,Sep,23 20:07 other posts 
And this is a turning point. There's never been a time before where people could make billions by producing nothing tangible. The demise of capitalism or, rather, the ultimate fate of it. For capitalism isn't interested any more in tangible technology but acts self-referentially. It exists for the sake of existing. Money isn't any longer representative of actual products or actual work but it exists for its own sake. We sell and buy money for no reason at all. Well, this has been happening for a while, but the Internet has made that happen faster and in an even more purposeless and dramatic fashion.
By #610414 08,Sep,23 08:43
You guys forget the underlying issue or problem. You, I, Ananas, Phart, and all the billions of people that use the internet for our enjoyment and ease of life. This is not a new concept. Think “insurance”. It doesn’t provide a product. Insurance has been around for eons. Now, we glue ourselves to the screen of our choice and spend hours doing…………nothing. WE make the billions of $$$ for them.
Would it be possible to mount a boycott of these social media giants? Maybe, but, it would be easier to convince dope heads to give up dope, and, whomever starts it would probably disappear never to be heard off again along with their families.
Phart, this one’s for you. Originally, the internet was conceived as a
quasi-GOVERNMENT, entity. 🤣🤣😈
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 08,Sep,23 17:29 other posts 
That's the problem of leaving everything to capitalism; I cannot do anything, without supporting the wealthy and exploitation of the poor.
That's why taking back all the privatized public facilities
is one of the biggest priorities in my Socialist Party's program.
Social media companies are not on the top of the list to nationalize,
but our updated program contains plans to further regulate them.
By phart [Ignore] 08,Sep,23 20:48 other posts 
So you want to essentially steal companys property and profits and assets and divy them out to suit yourselves? Who made you smarter than the companys that took the risk to create and grow their business's?

The old rumor, the Us government can't run a whore house comes to mind.


By #610414 06,Sep,23 12:08
AMSTERDAM, Sept 6 (Reuters) - The summer of 2023 was the hottest on record, according to data from the European Union Climate Change Service released on Wednesday.

The three-month period from June through August surpassed previous records by a large margin, with an average temperature of 16.8 degrees Celsius (62.2F) - 0.66C above average.

Last month was the also the hottest August on record globally, the third straight month in a row to set such a record following the hottest ever June and July, the EU said on Wednesday.

You know what this means. The world is heading for another Ice Age. 🤣🤣🤣😈
By phart [Ignore] 06,Sep,23 13:25 other posts 
YEA sure,we never been this warm before.
only registered users can see external links
By #610414 06,Sep,23 15:22
Come on. You jest, right? We are talking now.
By phart [Ignore] 06,Sep,23 22:17 other posts 
and 200 years from now some one will read about how hot it was this year and compare it to the temps they are dealing with at that time. If Kim hasn't boo booed and pushed the button while biden was asleep.
By #610414 07,Sep,23 07:21
Time marches on. You may or may not be right. Right now, today, all factual indicators show the climate getting hotter. Two hundred years from now it might be too hot to walk outside without protection.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 07,Sep,23 08:56 other posts 
You don't need to be a nuclear scientist to understand this graph.
only registered users can see external links
Phart is not a nuclear scientist. But he's certainly blindly religious.
By phart [Ignore] 07,Sep,23 11:46 other posts 
What converts carbon dioxide to oxygen we breath? TREES! What is Canada and california letting burn by the 1000's of acres? Trees.
And you want to point at a graph about carbon dioxide.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 07,Sep,23 16:47 other posts 
Carbon dioxide creates the greenhouse effect and hence warming of the planet. I guess you know that.

If then carbon dioxide is produced by trees mostly then we should get rid of trees and problem will be solved.
By phart [Ignore] 07,Sep,23 17:01 other posts 
the trees convert the evil carbon dioxide into life giving oxygen!
Deforestation started long before wildfires increased like this.
The wildfires are increasing because of increased heatwaves and drought.
They are worsened by climate change, and worsen climate change in return.
It's called a negative feedback loop.

There are more negative feedback loops, like e.g. permafrost: As permafrost thaws, bacteria can break down that organic matter, releasing that carbon
into the atmosphere as the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane.
That, in turn, worsens climate change.

Just the loss in forest area doesn't account for the higher CO2 levels.
In 2021, 1.76 billion tons of CO2 was released from burning boreal forests in North America and Eurasia. That was a record high then, but 2023 can beat it.
The CO2 emissions from fossil fuels were 37.12 billion tons. That's 21x more.
By #610414 07,Sep,23 18:11⤴
Letting them burn? That's 🤪
By phart [Ignore] 07,Sep,23 21:35 other posts 
Well, Why it is I seldom see anyone fighting the fires?
forest fires require bulldozers to cut fire lanes, there are plenty of surplus planes that could be bought by governments and converted to carry water and fire retardant. The military just quit using C130's recently, should be a glut of them somewhere cheap? hell for that matter, they are already government owned, so just modify them and put National guardsmen to flying them
Damn good airplane design, but no had to waste money designing a different 1.some of that unnecessary change.
But anyway back the forest fires, why aren't the people out there doing SOMETHING??
IS anything being done?
By #610414 08,Sep,23 13:21
The fires ARE being fought, but, the fire fighters are local and the burden of cost is on the municipality that the fire fighters belong to. Even Federal units have budgets. I don’t know what news sources you use, but, my local and national news sources are continually reporting the efforts of these forest fighting crews.
You are comparing temperatures from the last 500,000,000 years,
with a record temperature INCREASE, in the last 30 years.
How can you even fool yourself with such a stupid argument?

Even your own link supports climate change (last paragraph):

Like nothing we’ve ever seen

Earth’s hottest periods—the Hadean, the late Neoproterozoic, the Cretaceous Hot Greenhouse, the PETM—occurred before humans existed. Those ancient climates would have been like nothing our species has ever seen.

Modern human civilization, with its permanent agriculture and settlements, has developed over just the past 10,000 years or so. The period has generally been one of low temperatures and relative global (if not regional) climate stability. Compared to most of Earth’s history, today is unusually cold; we now live in what geologists call an interglacial—a period between glaciations of an ice age. But as greenhouse-gas emissions warm Earth’s climate, it's possible our planet has seen its last glaciation for a long time.
By dgraff [Ignore] 07,Sep,23 19:21 other posts 
Mid 70s for a day time high in the beautiful mountains of Pennsylvania dropping to the 50s at night no global warming reports here
By #610414 07,Sep,23 20:36
That stratified air you breathe up there is short on oxygen. It explains your erratic thinking, Mountain Man.
By dgraff [Ignore] 07,Sep,23 20:52 other posts 
I get plenty of oxygen from my beautiful assorted hardwood trees
Red Oak
White Oak
Birch
Cherry 🍒
Maple 🍁
Hickory
You name it I own it
By #610414 08,Sep,23 13:23
That's lovely. At least your doing your part, beside your voting.

So, do you have a big dome over your house and your trees?
By dgraff [Ignore] 08,Sep,23 17:48 other posts 
Not yet but I’m thinking about it
By leopoldij [Ignore] 07,Sep,23 20:03 other posts  ⤴
There's no point arguing with phart. Anything that Trump or any multibillion corporation disagrees with is, according to the perverse logic of phart, false.
By #610414 07,Sep,23 20:38
Makes him and them, a bunch of radicals. Whatever happened to conservatives?
By leopoldij [Ignore] 07,Sep,23 20:44 other posts 
Exactly. The ultra right wing people, the proud boys and the proud daddies (trump) do not even respect the conservative values they used to have. With a traditional conservative you could discuss. With those extremists, just like phart, you can't discuss. They come with preconceived bizarre ideas and concepts (such as: insurrection against the democracy is good; getting rid of States they don't like is good; etc) that no one should question. Even Nixon wasn't like that. And Reagan appears to be a reasonable guy in comparison to them.
By phart [Ignore] 07,Sep,23 21:52 other posts 
Anything not thought of prior to the last 2 minutes is preconceived, people with common sense use personal experiences and education to make decisions, and don't depend on college grads with liberal minds and far fetched ideas to decide for them. Leo, you literally must have never experiences anything in life other than living cushy. Or you would understand life is not a utopia and can never be 1.
Take a look at this map,
only registered users can see external links
See all the tiny blue spots? Biden votes, See all the red? Trump votes.
Now tell me,why in the hell we should be happy about a few small spots ruling the entire country?
That is why this united thing is NOT working out for the best.
Look at this link'
only registered users can see external links

1 interview I remember watching about this fight, the guy told a politician that he felt his voice was never heard. The politician said, "oh we hear you ,we just outvote you".
In other words, a large section of this state is NOT represented. So leaving is the best
By leopoldij [Ignore] 08,Sep,23 01:52 other posts 
Are you saying that Biden's election is illegal? Has it not happened according to the election procedure?
By #610414 08,Sep,23 08:10⤴
Phart you just described the democratic voting process used in this and most countries. If you get a result where 1001 votes when to blue and 1000 when they to red, then blue wins by ONE (1) vote.
“ See all the tiny blue spots? Biden votes, See all the red? Trump votes.
Now tell me,why in the hell we should be happy about a few small spots ruling the entire country?
The politician said, "oh we hear you ,we just outvote you".“

First: The winning side didn’t win because one person voted, it won because 1000+1 voted, A MAJORITY.
Second: the losing side IS REPRESENTED. The winner will represent EVERYONE.
The new policies brought forth are for everyone and, usually, is for the good of everyone. Yes, some policies will not get the approval of some people. That’s the way it is.
In other words, you, Phart, are a proponent of “if it’s what I like, then ok. If it’s not what I like, then we should revolt.”. That, Sir, is anarchy.
By phart [Ignore] 08,Sep,23 09:35 other posts 
-no it means 1000 in your example are not represented and are suppressed.
By #610414 08,Sep,23 11:14
No, it doesn't. When Trump got elected in 2016, did that mean that the Democrats had no representation? NO!!!


By leopoldij [Ignore] 06,Sep,23 01:20 other posts 
More GREAT NEWS:

only registered users can see external links

Justice still, partially, works.
--------------------------------------- added after 58 seconds

Ex-Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio jailed for 22 years for Capitol riot.

The Proud Boys' former leader has been jailed for 22 years for orchestrating the US Capitol riot, the longest sentence so far for a ringleader of the raid on the seat of American democracy.
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes

BUT THE REAL FIGURE LEADER OF PROUD BOYS AND OTHER FASCIST ORGANISATIONS, TRUMP, THEIR SYMBOL AND GOD, WON'T GO TO PRISON. HERE, JUSTICE DOESN'T WORK.
--------------------------------------- added after 5 minutes

"I am extremely ashamed and disappointed that they were caused grief and suffering," he told Washington's federal courthouse. "I will have to live with that shame for the rest of my life."
--------------------------------------- added after 7 minutes

Crocodile tears, of course. It's his lawyers who convinced him to appear remorseful and cry. He regrets nothing and he'd do it again if trump told him so.

Loser!


New Comment   Go to top

Pages:  #1... #43   #44   #45   #46   #47   #48   #49   #50   #51   #52   ...#195



Show your Genitals