Page #17
Pages: #1... #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 ...#59
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 4.Be honest!! 5.Is this about you 🤷♂️, those that live in glass houses should not throw stones. Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Hey piddles, you LOSER.
Why have you been running your mouth off about these people who need to be deleted and you haven’t even voted? What the fuck?
Don’t give me your usual bullshit just answer my question.
WHY DIDN’T YOU VOTE?
LOSER
--------------------------------------- added after 83 minutes
Hey piddles
I’m waaaaaaaiting... I think you should vote to delete these members so go ahead.
LOOOOOSER
only registered users can see external links
if it's your time to go,
what a mess, and a tragedy.
only registered users can see external links
This piece of shit should be deleted. With extreme prejudice.
Reported and I will find the names of any cunt that tries to vote no on the deletion. Members like Leopolda and Anuslicker will likely be on that list.
I don't even get to vote on anything.
If someone is consistently violating the TOS of this site, I support their ban,
but if you just don't like them, I would vote against their ban, if I even could.
If someone is being a p-e-d-o on this site, throw them the fuck out.
If this person has done nothing to violate the TOS of THIS SITE,
I don't give a fuck about whatever you say about them, because I don't trust you.
You are the exact type of person who would accuse someone of horrible things,
just because you don't like them. I hope no one listens to you to decide if someone
has violated the TOS.
The questionable images were there at one time however. at the time of my reviewing the referral, the images were removed. In good conscience, I could only vote "NO ABUSE" even though I feel that the entire profile is questionable, at best.
If those pictures are a clear violation of the Terms Of Use,
it's up to the moderators to decide to warn or immediately cancel that user.
I'm not, in any way, speaking out against that.
What I have spoken out against is acting against a user of this site for other reasons than how that person behaves on THIS site. That's beyond the responsibility of the moderators. It's even in violation of the Terms Of Use, because it has a Privacy clause, restricting this site from gathering any private information about its users. They have to judge the users on their actions on THIS SITE and this site ONLY.
So, I looked at that user's page now, and I agree it's questionable.
But, this is obviously an adult. No laws broken here, if this was consensual.
However, isn't it prohibited now to post nude pictures on this site, without verification? If this person is verified, they have offered evidence of identity and age,
if not, these photos should have been rejected during the upload process.
that its users need to respect or be applicable for removal.
This sites calls them Terms Of Use, but it's the same thing.
/rules.html
If someone sees something that is absolutely illegal on this site they need to inform admin immediately!
/blogs/45442.html
Regarding Ananas2xLekker, Ananas2xLekker didn't have any idea that Wildfreak85 was even reported so I do not believe that he was instrumental in notifying Wildfreak85 of anything.
Same thing with kebmo, he's in the PDT timezone while Wildfreak85 is CDT. I know kebmo to be fair minded individual. If someone was reported for posting an internet picture, he probably would have placed a freeze on voting and reached out to the reported member to suggest that they delete the picture. Anything other than that, NO WAY!
I don’t have to justify my actions to you but I will say this; I was expecting you to be all whiny and crying for your mommy when things didn’t go the way you wanted. Of course I was right.
You are trailed
You are a toy and I am a cat just pushing you off the table.
Anuslicker You are a fucking piece of shit.
Just what mother objectifies their daughter?
/046djzi2f1ahpic.html
Seriously, what mother chooses to post pictures of her daughter's breasts?
That's not me defending any user, that's me criticizing your process.
Defendants are innocent until proven guilty. Ever heard of that?
kebmo go fuck yourself cunt.
"Reported and I will find the names of any cunt that tries to vote no on the deletion. Members like Leopolda and Anuslicker will likely be on that list."
If I'm addressed in this way, I respond to it. I CANNOT EVEN VOTE!!!
If Sir Skittles points out a shady member, by describing the offenses of that member objectively, and I agree it is a violation of the Terms Of Use, I would not object to sanctions against that member. I would have supported Sir-Skittles.
The Terms Of Use say: "By accessing the site, you agree to conduct yourself in an adult manner. This specifically means being polite to all members in chats and in the discussion forums. Aggressive behavior will not be tolerated by any member."
I see Sir-Skittles violate that Site Rule more than almost everyone else here.
I will trash yer scummy page daily
--------------------------------------- added after 89 seconds
Done talking about it, finished
Somewhere in the Forum, Skittles called out/called attention to a profile established under the screen name of Wildfreak85 as being something that appeared to be revenge porn. I looked, I agreed and publicly reached out to admin regarding Wildfreak85 asking whether he believed the profile belonged to a 38 year old female. admin's response on June 19, 2024 was as follows;
"I've seen many freaks on this site, so I can't be 100% sure. The proof of age provided was very proper though. May be she is held hostage by abusive spouse, idk."
Your analogy about not seeing someone shot another and being innocent was a good analogy but as a long time member, you are also aware of the 10 day clause, right? I believe that you are an independent thinker, is it possible that Wildfreak85 uploaded questionable content and 1) saw Skittles report or post in the Forum and removed the content OR 2) just had second thoughts regarding their upload and voluntarily removed it?
Haha piddles I win! I made you waste 1050 points on me. All for me and it’s not even my birthday.
L O S E R
Do I get another 1050 points for this? Looking forward to it.
L O S E R
Canadian loser- get Bella to clean your page loser
End Sarcasm
Oh I like my page just the way it i Is. Every time I open it I will think of what a dumb Idiot you are for wasting your points to no avail.
L O S E R
Jul 6, 21:12 system: kebmo updated the comment on your abuse report: I don’t see why it’s wrong. It looks like a magazine cover and you have given no valid reason why it is wrong. Where did it come from?
Jul 6, 21:09 system: kebmo updated the comment on your abuse report: I don’t see why it’s wrong. It looks like a magazine cover and you have given no valid reason why it is wrong.
Jul 6, 21:07 system: kebmo added a comment on your abuse report: I don’t see why it’s wrong. It looks like a magazine cover and you have given no reason to delete the member.
The poster has a few pics up in which you call magazine covers of other pics claiming her daughter is in them... She refers to her daughter as a fat bottomed whore... It is possible if the poster is 38 then the so called daughter is ****, and being objectified by her so called slut mother. The "daughter" appears to be ****.
After you changed your post and added another photo I changed my response.
“it is possible the poster is 38”
“the daughter appears to be (a minor)”
It’s all weak on factual information.
Let the cards fall where they may. I’ll sit this one out… maybe
--------------------------------------- added after 4 hours
… and now it’s frozen.
You stated that the site would be a ghost town. I guess having a site full of child predators is much better.
It looks like everyone sat this one out. Why didn’t this member get deleted yesterday? It sat there for five hours and nobody touched it except me then cloudbreak froze it.
Like I said, I’ll let the cards fall where they may.
--------------------------------------- added after 8 minutes
Correction: it sat for 6.5 hours before getting frozen.
I would vote in favor of banning such a member.
Understand that it is illusion to think you can kick someone off for good. However, it might be better to force the person to comply with the rules. If you ban them, they can just make a new e-mail account and register with it as a new member, under another name. Instead of a warned person who this site can keep an eye on, you have no idea and the 'new' member thinks they beat the system.
Still, if I would have voting rights and you expect me to vote on a member's removal, I need some confirmation that the member has violated the rules. EVIDENCE! If you don't have it, I would vote against removal. People are accusing each other of horrible things, left and right. I won't fall for cheap tricks to get your enemies kicked out.
only registered users can see external links
She doesn't like them to spend 5-10 million dollars on the hush money case.
Trump has to pay fines of $355 million plus interest on his fraud case, they can spend some of it to get this serial offender on all his other crimes. Law and Order ain't free.
She pretends to be a judge, but doesn't understand the crime?
Election interference! He would have had no chance to win the election, if everyone knew he was a whoremonger, who fucked women he paid, while his wife was pregnant.
Besides doing all the fraud to hide it, it's election interference, which is a crime.
A good business man?
Trump was bankrupted 6 times. Even before he was president, he had seen the inside of a courtroom more than all Judge Judy episodes combined. Trump is just a conman,
who played a good business man on TV. If he hadn't inherited an empire from his father, he would have been a bad car salesman or one of those phone scammers.
MAGA are the people who fall for those cheap lies. I just laugh and hang up.
Judge Judy is either an idiot or biassed.
New Comment Go to top