Page #19
Pages: #1... #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 ...#59
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 4.Be honest!! 5.Is this about you 🤷♂️, those that live in glass houses should not throw stones. Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
bam-A-lam!!
helping is futile.
I would also not want to be near any man that would r-pe either 1 of them, they would be scum bags for sure
Not Hitlers SS,
It's odd, for the longest time, the STUFF thread was where a big share of forum posters would post. Lacking originality Twowarmtts/CAT paid twenty points and launched her spinoff of "STUFF" in which she would snag something she deemed interesting found posted in my thread that could possibly attract the attention her site friends of lix and leopoldij. In my opinion, it was always first and foremost for Candy to be seen and feel relevant at whatever cost.
It is interesting that phart will post in several threads however members, ie Ananas2xLekker and tecsan for the most part, will chose to post elsewhere.
Maybe I don't often consider things 'questionable stuff'. When people act eccentric, I might think: 'That would be the last thing I would do!', but I also sort of admire the person for embracing individualism. If an expression of individualism doesn't hurt anyone, I don't consider it 'questionable stuff'. If it does really hurt people, I don't consider it 'questionable stuff' often either, I mostly have other value judgements about it than 'questionable'.
Maybe you call things 'questionable stuff' not because it's a gray area for you personally, but because you are aware of the public debate related to those things. There is of course a hot tension field between free speech and cancel culture.
Is that the type of topic you like to discuss here?
while still treating each other like human beings.
[deleted image]
1. A site loon
2. A known scummy
3. A stay at home cheese puff eater making shit up with stolen pics
member wildfreak85
Should this scummy have "its" page trashed?
Vote 1 for yes
Vote 2 for no
In my mind and head, I recognize that I tend to think that men are more I "freakish" than women. I must say that I quite enjoyed your narrative, the female might be being held hostage by an abusive spouse. Thanks for thinking "outside of the box".
only registered users can see external links
It is a corrupt shit hole
Just an aside, I've always said I suck in the punctuation department. When I look at my post I asked a question and dammit, I forgot to use the damn "?" at the end of my sentence/thought.
Frank Sinatra, however, believed it to be a "toddlin' town"...
Well, Yea, I guess it coulda been "Adam's apple" first?
New Comment Go to top